Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial

Background: Suitable mechanical ventilation strategies can reduce the incidence and severity of ventilator-associated lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, the effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory vent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babak Alikiaii, Saeed Abbasi, Hamideh Yari, Mojtaba Akbari, Parviz Kashefi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2022;volume=27;issue=1;spage=6;epage=6;aulast=Alikiaii
_version_ 1818083714046885888
author Babak Alikiaii
Saeed Abbasi
Hamideh Yari
Mojtaba Akbari
Parviz Kashefi
author_facet Babak Alikiaii
Saeed Abbasi
Hamideh Yari
Mojtaba Akbari
Parviz Kashefi
author_sort Babak Alikiaii
collection DOAJ
description Background: Suitable mechanical ventilation strategies can reduce the incidence and severity of ventilator-associated lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, the effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on respiratory parameters and arterial blood gases (ABGs) parameters were compared in ARDS patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups of ASV and SIMV. Patients were followed up for 3 days, and respiratory parameters including rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), spontaneous breathing rate (SBR), minute volume, and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) as the primary outcomes and ABG parameters including PaO2, FiO2, PaCO2, HCO3, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio as the secondary outcomes were measured. Results: PIP in patients in the SIMV group on the 1st day (P = 0.013), 2nd day (P = 0.001), and 3rd day (P = 0.004) was statistically significantly more compared to those in patients in the ASV group. RSBI, SBR, and minute volume between the ASV and SIMV groups during the 3 days were not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05). The mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2, and PH between both groups were similar (P > 0.05). At the end of the 2nd and 3rd days, the level of FiO2 and PaCO2 in ASV was significantly lower than those in ASV group. HCO3 in each of the 3 days in the ASV group was statistically significantly lower than that in the SIMV group (P < 0.050). PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients in the ASV group in the 3 days was statistically significantly higher than that in the SIMV group (P < 0.050). Conclusion: By reducing PIP and improving oxygenation and ABG parameters, ASV mode may be a safe and feasible mode during mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:42:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3e2034643f84e2092f88a9a218c0571
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:42:23Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f3e2034643f84e2092f88a9a218c05712022-12-22T01:35:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362022-01-012716610.4103/jrms.JRMS_905_18Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trialBabak AlikiaiiSaeed AbbasiHamideh YariMojtaba AkbariParviz KashefiBackground: Suitable mechanical ventilation strategies can reduce the incidence and severity of ventilator-associated lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, the effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on respiratory parameters and arterial blood gases (ABGs) parameters were compared in ARDS patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups of ASV and SIMV. Patients were followed up for 3 days, and respiratory parameters including rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), spontaneous breathing rate (SBR), minute volume, and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) as the primary outcomes and ABG parameters including PaO2, FiO2, PaCO2, HCO3, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio as the secondary outcomes were measured. Results: PIP in patients in the SIMV group on the 1st day (P = 0.013), 2nd day (P = 0.001), and 3rd day (P = 0.004) was statistically significantly more compared to those in patients in the ASV group. RSBI, SBR, and minute volume between the ASV and SIMV groups during the 3 days were not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05). The mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2, and PH between both groups were similar (P > 0.05). At the end of the 2nd and 3rd days, the level of FiO2 and PaCO2 in ASV was significantly lower than those in ASV group. HCO3 in each of the 3 days in the ASV group was statistically significantly lower than that in the SIMV group (P < 0.050). PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients in the ASV group in the 3 days was statistically significantly higher than that in the SIMV group (P < 0.050). Conclusion: By reducing PIP and improving oxygenation and ABG parameters, ASV mode may be a safe and feasible mode during mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2022;volume=27;issue=1;spage=6;epage=6;aulast=Alikiaiiadaptive support ventilationintensive care unitsrespiratory distress syndromesynchronized intermittent mandatory ventilationventilation strategies
spellingShingle Babak Alikiaii
Saeed Abbasi
Hamideh Yari
Mojtaba Akbari
Parviz Kashefi
Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
adaptive support ventilation
intensive care units
respiratory distress syndrome
synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation
ventilation strategies
title Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome a randomized clinical trial
topic adaptive support ventilation
intensive care units
respiratory distress syndrome
synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation
ventilation strategies
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2022;volume=27;issue=1;spage=6;epage=6;aulast=Alikiaii
work_keys_str_mv AT babakalikiaii comparisonofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saeedabbasi comparisonofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hamidehyari comparisonofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mojtabaakbari comparisonofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parvizkashefi comparisonofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial