Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Inadvertent malposition of a pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle is an uncommon event, and its actual incidence is probably unknown. It may be underestimated and underreported because of a possible asymptomatic cours...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogin Marc B, Azab Basem N, Zaher Medhat F, Bekheit Soad G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-02-01
Series:Journal of Medical Case Reports
Online Access:http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/5/1/54
_version_ 1811251573014134784
author Bogin Marc B
Azab Basem N
Zaher Medhat F
Bekheit Soad G
author_facet Bogin Marc B
Azab Basem N
Zaher Medhat F
Bekheit Soad G
author_sort Bogin Marc B
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Inadvertent malposition of a pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle is an uncommon event, and its actual incidence is probably unknown. It may be underestimated and underreported because of a possible asymptomatic course. A 12-lead electrocardiogram is important to confirm proper placement.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report a case of a 60-year-old Caucasian man with a malpositioned transvenous permanent pacing lead into the left ventricle via a patent foramen ovale that was not suspected during implantation and went undiagnosed for two years without complications. The patient remained asymptomatic as he was being treated with oral anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. The decision was made to leave the pacing lead in place and continue lifelong warfarin therapy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Inadvertent insertion of pacing wires into the left ventricle is a potentially dangerous complication that may happen under fluoroscopic guidance and may be overlooked by routine pacemaker interrogation. It is advisable to obtain a 12-lead electrocardiogram during or immediately after transvenous pacemaker implantation rather than use a routine pacemaker interrogation or a limited electrocardiogram.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:22:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3e58e1aa70c44feaab6d7f4227af4e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-1947
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:22:26Z
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Case Reports
spelling doaj.art-f3e58e1aa70c44feaab6d7f4227af4e12022-12-22T03:25:32ZengBMCJournal of Medical Case Reports1752-19472011-02-01515410.1186/1752-1947-5-54Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case reportBogin Marc BAzab Basem NZaher Medhat FBekheit Soad G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Inadvertent malposition of a pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle is an uncommon event, and its actual incidence is probably unknown. It may be underestimated and underreported because of a possible asymptomatic course. A 12-lead electrocardiogram is important to confirm proper placement.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report a case of a 60-year-old Caucasian man with a malpositioned transvenous permanent pacing lead into the left ventricle via a patent foramen ovale that was not suspected during implantation and went undiagnosed for two years without complications. The patient remained asymptomatic as he was being treated with oral anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. The decision was made to leave the pacing lead in place and continue lifelong warfarin therapy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Inadvertent insertion of pacing wires into the left ventricle is a potentially dangerous complication that may happen under fluoroscopic guidance and may be overlooked by routine pacemaker interrogation. It is advisable to obtain a 12-lead electrocardiogram during or immediately after transvenous pacemaker implantation rather than use a routine pacemaker interrogation or a limited electrocardiogram.</p>http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/5/1/54
spellingShingle Bogin Marc B
Azab Basem N
Zaher Medhat F
Bekheit Soad G
Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reports
title Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
title_full Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
title_fullStr Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
title_short Inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later: a case report
title_sort inadvertent malposition of a permanent pacemaker ventricular lead into the left ventricle which was initially missed and diagnosed two years later a case report
url http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/5/1/54
work_keys_str_mv AT boginmarcb inadvertentmalpositionofapermanentpacemakerventricularleadintotheleftventriclewhichwasinitiallymissedanddiagnosedtwoyearslateracasereport
AT azabbasemn inadvertentmalpositionofapermanentpacemakerventricularleadintotheleftventriclewhichwasinitiallymissedanddiagnosedtwoyearslateracasereport
AT zahermedhatf inadvertentmalpositionofapermanentpacemakerventricularleadintotheleftventriclewhichwasinitiallymissedanddiagnosedtwoyearslateracasereport
AT bekheitsoadg inadvertentmalpositionofapermanentpacemakerventricularleadintotheleftventriclewhichwasinitiallymissedanddiagnosedtwoyearslateracasereport