Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of protective football headgear on peripheral vision reaction time and visual target detection. Twenty-five Division I NCAA football players (age = 20.5 yrs ± 0.9, height = 185.9 cm ± 6.8, body mass = 99.2 kg ± 19.2, BMI...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel A. Miller, Rebecca R. Rogers, Tyler D. Williams, Mallory R. Marshall, Justin R. Moody, Robert W. Hensarling, Christopher G. Ballmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/9/213
_version_ 1797999581562142720
author Rachel A. Miller
Rebecca R. Rogers
Tyler D. Williams
Mallory R. Marshall
Justin R. Moody
Robert W. Hensarling
Christopher G. Ballmann
author_facet Rachel A. Miller
Rebecca R. Rogers
Tyler D. Williams
Mallory R. Marshall
Justin R. Moody
Robert W. Hensarling
Christopher G. Ballmann
author_sort Rachel A. Miller
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of protective football headgear on peripheral vision reaction time and visual target detection. Twenty-five Division I NCAA football players (age = 20.5 yrs ± 0.9, height = 185.9 cm ± 6.8, body mass = 99.2 kg ± 19.2, BMI = 29.6 ± 4.5) participated. In a crossover counterbalanced study design, subjects participated in one visit with three conditions: Baseline (BL) without headgear, helmet only (HO), helmet with an eye shield (HE). Subjects completed a 1-min peripheral vision reaction time test for each condition separated by 3-min recovery periods. Tests were administered using a 64 light Dynavision D2 Visuomotor board. Target detection (total hit score) was higher during BL than HO (p < 0.001) and HE (p < 0.001). Average (p < 0.001), peak (p < 0.001), minimum (p < 0.001), and median (p < 0.001) peripheral reaction times were faster during BL than HO and HE. No significant differences were observed for any measures between HO and HE conditions (p > 0.05). Findings indicate that protective football headgear impaired reaction time to peripheral visual stimuli. The addition of an eye shield to the helmet had a small non-significant effect on reaction time and target detection. These results may hold important implications in helmet design and player safety.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:06:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3e86b3ceda04fc29ebe7eed9f05657c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:06:55Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-f3e86b3ceda04fc29ebe7eed9f05657c2022-12-22T04:28:17ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632019-09-017921310.3390/sports7090213sports7090213Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football PlayersRachel A. Miller0Rebecca R. Rogers1Tyler D. Williams2Mallory R. Marshall3Justin R. Moody4Robert W. Hensarling5Christopher G. Ballmann6Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USADepartment of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USAThe purpose of this study was to examine the effects of protective football headgear on peripheral vision reaction time and visual target detection. Twenty-five Division I NCAA football players (age = 20.5 yrs ± 0.9, height = 185.9 cm ± 6.8, body mass = 99.2 kg ± 19.2, BMI = 29.6 ± 4.5) participated. In a crossover counterbalanced study design, subjects participated in one visit with three conditions: Baseline (BL) without headgear, helmet only (HO), helmet with an eye shield (HE). Subjects completed a 1-min peripheral vision reaction time test for each condition separated by 3-min recovery periods. Tests were administered using a 64 light Dynavision D2 Visuomotor board. Target detection (total hit score) was higher during BL than HO (p < 0.001) and HE (p < 0.001). Average (p < 0.001), peak (p < 0.001), minimum (p < 0.001), and median (p < 0.001) peripheral reaction times were faster during BL than HO and HE. No significant differences were observed for any measures between HO and HE conditions (p > 0.05). Findings indicate that protective football headgear impaired reaction time to peripheral visual stimuli. The addition of an eye shield to the helmet had a small non-significant effect on reaction time and target detection. These results may hold important implications in helmet design and player safety.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/9/213college footballdynavisionfootball helmeteye shieldvisorfacemask
spellingShingle Rachel A. Miller
Rebecca R. Rogers
Tyler D. Williams
Mallory R. Marshall
Justin R. Moody
Robert W. Hensarling
Christopher G. Ballmann
Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
Sports
college football
dynavision
football helmet
eye shield
visor
facemask
title Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
title_full Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
title_fullStr Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
title_short Effects of Protective American Football Headgear on Peripheral Vision Reaction Time and Visual Target Detection in Division I NCAA Football Players
title_sort effects of protective american football headgear on peripheral vision reaction time and visual target detection in division i ncaa football players
topic college football
dynavision
football helmet
eye shield
visor
facemask
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/9/213
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelamiller effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT rebeccarrogers effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT tylerdwilliams effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT malloryrmarshall effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT justinrmoody effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT robertwhensarling effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers
AT christophergballmann effectsofprotectiveamericanfootballheadgearonperipheralvisionreactiontimeandvisualtargetdetectionindivisionincaafootballplayers