Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study

Background: The management of patients receiving warfarin is complicated. This study evaluated the anticoagulation quality of warfarin, explored potential predictors associated with poor anticoagulation quality, and elucidated the role of clinical pharmacists in the management of warfarin treatment....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sha Qiu, Na Wang, Chi Zhang, Zhi-Chun Gu, Yan Qian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.605353/full
_version_ 1818591346818023424
author Sha Qiu
Na Wang
Chi Zhang
Zhi-Chun Gu
Yan Qian
author_facet Sha Qiu
Na Wang
Chi Zhang
Zhi-Chun Gu
Yan Qian
author_sort Sha Qiu
collection DOAJ
description Background: The management of patients receiving warfarin is complicated. This study evaluated the anticoagulation quality of warfarin, explored potential predictors associated with poor anticoagulation quality, and elucidated the role of clinical pharmacists in the management of warfarin treatment.Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients who either initially received warfarin or returned to warfarin after withdrawal between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2020. The primary outcome was time in therapeutic range (TTR), and a TTR of ≥60% was considered as good anticoagulation quality. The secondary outcomes included thromboembolic and bleeding events during the follow-up. We assessed the TTR of each participant and investigated the potential predictors of poor anticoagulation quality (TTR < 60%) using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we compared the warfarin anticoagulant quality and the incidence of clinical adverse events between atrial fibrillation patients in physician–pharmacist collaborative clinics (PPCCs) and general clinics.Results: Totally, 378 patients were included. The mean TTR of patients was 42.6 ± 29.8%, with only 32% of patients having achieved good anticoagulation quality. During a mean follow-up period of 192 ± 92 days, we found no significant differences in the incidences of thromboembolic events (5.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.967) and bleeding events (1.7% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.241) between patients with good and those with poor anticoagulation quality. The presence of PPCCs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.90, p = 0.022) was an independent protective factor of poor anticoagulation quality, while the presence of more than four comorbidities (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.22–3.24, p = 0.006) and an average interval of international normalized ratio monitoring of >30 days (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.10–2.76, p = 0.019) were independent risk factors of poor anticoagulation quality. Compared with atrial fibrillation patients in general clinics, patients in PPCCs were found to have a significantly increased mean TTR level (48.4% ± 25.7% vs. 38.0% ± 27.6%, p = 0.014).Conclusion: The anticoagulation quality of warfarin was relatively low at our institution. The presence of more than four comorbidities and an average interval of international normalized ratio monitoring of >30 days independently contributed to poor anticoagulation quality. Meanwhile, the use of PPCC model improved the anticoagulation quality of warfarin.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T10:10:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3f353e80e1c421b8e977acec68595a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T10:10:59Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-f3f353e80e1c421b8e977acec68595a52022-12-21T22:35:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-01-011110.3389/fphar.2020.605353605353Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center StudySha Qiu0Na Wang1Chi Zhang2Zhi-Chun Gu3Yan Qian4Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaBackground: The management of patients receiving warfarin is complicated. This study evaluated the anticoagulation quality of warfarin, explored potential predictors associated with poor anticoagulation quality, and elucidated the role of clinical pharmacists in the management of warfarin treatment.Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients who either initially received warfarin or returned to warfarin after withdrawal between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2020. The primary outcome was time in therapeutic range (TTR), and a TTR of ≥60% was considered as good anticoagulation quality. The secondary outcomes included thromboembolic and bleeding events during the follow-up. We assessed the TTR of each participant and investigated the potential predictors of poor anticoagulation quality (TTR < 60%) using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we compared the warfarin anticoagulant quality and the incidence of clinical adverse events between atrial fibrillation patients in physician–pharmacist collaborative clinics (PPCCs) and general clinics.Results: Totally, 378 patients were included. The mean TTR of patients was 42.6 ± 29.8%, with only 32% of patients having achieved good anticoagulation quality. During a mean follow-up period of 192 ± 92 days, we found no significant differences in the incidences of thromboembolic events (5.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.967) and bleeding events (1.7% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.241) between patients with good and those with poor anticoagulation quality. The presence of PPCCs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.90, p = 0.022) was an independent protective factor of poor anticoagulation quality, while the presence of more than four comorbidities (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.22–3.24, p = 0.006) and an average interval of international normalized ratio monitoring of >30 days (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.10–2.76, p = 0.019) were independent risk factors of poor anticoagulation quality. Compared with atrial fibrillation patients in general clinics, patients in PPCCs were found to have a significantly increased mean TTR level (48.4% ± 25.7% vs. 38.0% ± 27.6%, p = 0.014).Conclusion: The anticoagulation quality of warfarin was relatively low at our institution. The presence of more than four comorbidities and an average interval of international normalized ratio monitoring of >30 days independently contributed to poor anticoagulation quality. Meanwhile, the use of PPCC model improved the anticoagulation quality of warfarin.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.605353/fullwarfarinanticoagulation qualitytime in therapeutic rangerisk factorsclinical pharmacist
spellingShingle Sha Qiu
Na Wang
Chi Zhang
Zhi-Chun Gu
Yan Qian
Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
Frontiers in Pharmacology
warfarin
anticoagulation quality
time in therapeutic range
risk factors
clinical pharmacist
title Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
title_full Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
title_short Anticoagulation Quality of Warfarin and the Role of Physician–Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics in the Treatment of Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
title_sort anticoagulation quality of warfarin and the role of physician pharmacist collaborative clinics in the treatment of patients receiving warfarin a retrospective observational single center study
topic warfarin
anticoagulation quality
time in therapeutic range
risk factors
clinical pharmacist
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.605353/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shaqiu anticoagulationqualityofwarfarinandtheroleofphysicianpharmacistcollaborativeclinicsinthetreatmentofpatientsreceivingwarfarinaretrospectiveobservationalsinglecenterstudy
AT nawang anticoagulationqualityofwarfarinandtheroleofphysicianpharmacistcollaborativeclinicsinthetreatmentofpatientsreceivingwarfarinaretrospectiveobservationalsinglecenterstudy
AT chizhang anticoagulationqualityofwarfarinandtheroleofphysicianpharmacistcollaborativeclinicsinthetreatmentofpatientsreceivingwarfarinaretrospectiveobservationalsinglecenterstudy
AT zhichungu anticoagulationqualityofwarfarinandtheroleofphysicianpharmacistcollaborativeclinicsinthetreatmentofpatientsreceivingwarfarinaretrospectiveobservationalsinglecenterstudy
AT yanqian anticoagulationqualityofwarfarinandtheroleofphysicianpharmacistcollaborativeclinicsinthetreatmentofpatientsreceivingwarfarinaretrospectiveobservationalsinglecenterstudy