Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection

Christoph NiederhauserBlood Transfusion Service SRC, Bern, SwitzerlandAbstract: Before 1970, approximately 6% of multi-transfused recipients acquired a transfusion-transmitted Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The safety improvements since then have been tremendous. From a level of a few infections...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Niederhauser C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2011-07-01
Series:Journal of Blood Medicine
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/reducing-the-risk-of-hepatitis-b-virus-transfusion-transmitted-infecti-a7886
_version_ 1811256852423376896
author Niederhauser C
author_facet Niederhauser C
author_sort Niederhauser C
collection DOAJ
description Christoph NiederhauserBlood Transfusion Service SRC, Bern, SwitzerlandAbstract: Before 1970, approximately 6% of multi-transfused recipients acquired a transfusion-transmitted Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The safety improvements since then have been tremendous. From a level of a few infections per 1000 donations, the risk today, depending on the screening algorithm and additional measurements performed, has decreased to around 1:500,000 to 1:1,000,000, an improvement greater than 1000-fold compared to 50 years ago. This enormous gain in safety has been achieved through many factors, including development of increasingly more sensitive Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) assays; the adoption in some countries of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) screening; an improved donor selection procedure; HBV vaccination programs; and finally the introduction of HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT). Because there is a tendency in transfusion medicine to add one safety measure on top of another to approach the ultimate goal of zero risks, costs become increasingly a matter of debate. It is obvious that any new measure in addition to existing methods or measures will have very poor cost effectiveness. Therefore each country needs to perform its own calculation based on the country's own epidemiology, resources, political and public awareness of the risks, in order to choose the correct and most cost-efficient measures. Ideally, each country would make decisions regarding implementation of additional blood safety measures in the context of both the perceived benefit and the allocation of overall health care resources.Keywords: hepatitis B virus, transfusion-transmitted infection, HBsAg, anti-HBc, NAT
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:47:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3f70428037d4ccf9ec24234adc5b2fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-2736
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:47:35Z
publishDate 2011-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Blood Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f3f70428037d4ccf9ec24234adc5b2fd2022-12-22T03:22:36ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Blood Medicine1179-27362011-07-012011default91102Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infectionNiederhauser CChristoph NiederhauserBlood Transfusion Service SRC, Bern, SwitzerlandAbstract: Before 1970, approximately 6% of multi-transfused recipients acquired a transfusion-transmitted Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The safety improvements since then have been tremendous. From a level of a few infections per 1000 donations, the risk today, depending on the screening algorithm and additional measurements performed, has decreased to around 1:500,000 to 1:1,000,000, an improvement greater than 1000-fold compared to 50 years ago. This enormous gain in safety has been achieved through many factors, including development of increasingly more sensitive Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) assays; the adoption in some countries of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) screening; an improved donor selection procedure; HBV vaccination programs; and finally the introduction of HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT). Because there is a tendency in transfusion medicine to add one safety measure on top of another to approach the ultimate goal of zero risks, costs become increasingly a matter of debate. It is obvious that any new measure in addition to existing methods or measures will have very poor cost effectiveness. Therefore each country needs to perform its own calculation based on the country's own epidemiology, resources, political and public awareness of the risks, in order to choose the correct and most cost-efficient measures. Ideally, each country would make decisions regarding implementation of additional blood safety measures in the context of both the perceived benefit and the allocation of overall health care resources.Keywords: hepatitis B virus, transfusion-transmitted infection, HBsAg, anti-HBc, NAThttp://www.dovepress.com/reducing-the-risk-of-hepatitis-b-virus-transfusion-transmitted-infecti-a7886
spellingShingle Niederhauser C
Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
Journal of Blood Medicine
title Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
title_full Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
title_fullStr Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
title_short Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection
title_sort reducing the risk of hepatitis b virus transfusion transmitted infection
url http://www.dovepress.com/reducing-the-risk-of-hepatitis-b-virus-transfusion-transmitted-infecti-a7886
work_keys_str_mv AT niederhauserc reducingtheriskofhepatitisbvirustransfusiontransmittedinfection