Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments

Personal Breast Cancer (BC) Risk Assessments (PBCRA) have potential to stratify women into clinically-actionable BC risk categories. As this could involve population-wide genomic testing, women’s attitudes to PBCRA and views on acceptable implementation platforms must be considered to ensure optimal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria A. Sierra, Jack C. W. Wheeler, Lisa Devereux, Alison H. Trainer, Louise Keogh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/10/992
_version_ 1797514211248570368
author Maria A. Sierra
Jack C. W. Wheeler
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Louise Keogh
author_facet Maria A. Sierra
Jack C. W. Wheeler
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Louise Keogh
author_sort Maria A. Sierra
collection DOAJ
description Personal Breast Cancer (BC) Risk Assessments (PBCRA) have potential to stratify women into clinically-actionable BC risk categories. As this could involve population-wide genomic testing, women’s attitudes to PBCRA and views on acceptable implementation platforms must be considered to ensure optimal population participation. We explored these issues with 31 women with different BC risk profiles through semi-structured focus group discussions or interviews. Inductive thematic coding of transcripts was performed. Subsequently, women listed factors that would impact on their decision to participate. Participants’ attitudes to PBCRA were positive. Identified themes included that PBCRA acceptance hinges on result actionability. Women value the ability to inform decision-making. Participants reported anxiety, stress, and genetic discrimination as potential barriers. The age at which PBCRA was offered, ease of access, and how results are returned held importance. Most women value the opportunity for PBCRA to inform increased surveillance, while highlighting hesitance to accept reduced surveillance as they find reassurance in regular screening. Women with <i>BRCA</i> pathogenic variants value the potential for PBCRA to identify a lower cancer risk and potentially inform delayed prophylactic surgery. This study highlights complexities in adopting advances in BC early detection, especially for current users who value existing processes as a social good.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:28:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f403d4f6d58d4274ad87b5a2144cab75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:28:25Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f403d4f6d58d4274ad87b5a2144cab752023-11-22T18:48:57ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262021-09-01111099210.3390/jpm11100992Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk AssessmentsMaria A. Sierra0Jack C. W. Wheeler1Lisa Devereux2Alison H. Trainer3Louise Keogh4Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USACentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaResearch Division, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3000, AustraliaParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaPersonal Breast Cancer (BC) Risk Assessments (PBCRA) have potential to stratify women into clinically-actionable BC risk categories. As this could involve population-wide genomic testing, women’s attitudes to PBCRA and views on acceptable implementation platforms must be considered to ensure optimal population participation. We explored these issues with 31 women with different BC risk profiles through semi-structured focus group discussions or interviews. Inductive thematic coding of transcripts was performed. Subsequently, women listed factors that would impact on their decision to participate. Participants’ attitudes to PBCRA were positive. Identified themes included that PBCRA acceptance hinges on result actionability. Women value the ability to inform decision-making. Participants reported anxiety, stress, and genetic discrimination as potential barriers. The age at which PBCRA was offered, ease of access, and how results are returned held importance. Most women value the opportunity for PBCRA to inform increased surveillance, while highlighting hesitance to accept reduced surveillance as they find reassurance in regular screening. Women with <i>BRCA</i> pathogenic variants value the potential for PBCRA to identify a lower cancer risk and potentially inform delayed prophylactic surgery. This study highlights complexities in adopting advances in BC early detection, especially for current users who value existing processes as a social good.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/10/992risk-stratified breast screeningpolygenic riskimplementationbreast cancer risk
spellingShingle Maria A. Sierra
Jack C. W. Wheeler
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Louise Keogh
Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
Journal of Personalized Medicine
risk-stratified breast screening
polygenic risk
implementation
breast cancer risk
title Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
title_full Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
title_fullStr Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
title_short Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments
title_sort exploring implementation of personal breast cancer risk assessments
topic risk-stratified breast screening
polygenic risk
implementation
breast cancer risk
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/10/992
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaasierra exploringimplementationofpersonalbreastcancerriskassessments
AT jackcwwheeler exploringimplementationofpersonalbreastcancerriskassessments
AT lisadevereux exploringimplementationofpersonalbreastcancerriskassessments
AT alisonhtrainer exploringimplementationofpersonalbreastcancerriskassessments
AT louisekeogh exploringimplementationofpersonalbreastcancerriskassessments