Responding to Aesthetic Reasons

What makes a certain consideration an aesthetic reason rather than a reason of some other kind? Is it a solely a matter of the kind of attitude or activity that the reason supports? How fundamental or structural are such reasons? Do they contrast in a natural way with epistemic or practical reasons?...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew McGonigal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2017-03-01
Series:Estetika
Online Access:https://estetikajournal.org/articles/155
_version_ 1819059193358843904
author Andrew McGonigal
author_facet Andrew McGonigal
author_sort Andrew McGonigal
collection DOAJ
description What makes a certain consideration an aesthetic reason rather than a reason of some other kind? Is it a solely a matter of the kind of attitude or activity that the reason supports? How fundamental or structural are such reasons? Do they contrast in a natural way with epistemic or practical reasons? Is skilled aesthetic achievement, whether interpretative or creative, a matter of recognizing the aesthetic reasons we have for a given response, and correctly according with such reasons? In this paper, I offer a preliminary discussion of these topics. I argue that our account of aesthetic reasons should respect the fact that they play an important regulative role, over and above directly supporting aesthetic response. Such a role allows aesthetic reasons to moderate a wide range of practical and epistemic activities, but not by adding or substituting distinctively aesthetic ends or purposes for such activities. I then go on to argue against the view that skilled aesthetic achievement consists in correct recognition of and accord with aesthetic reasons, adapting a recent argument of Timothy Williamson’s.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T14:07:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f417a1a8a7364a70a28e2c188e4c880f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-0915
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T14:07:12Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Helsinki University Press
record_format Article
series Estetika
spelling doaj.art-f417a1a8a7364a70a28e2c188e4c880f2022-12-21T19:01:11ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika2571-09152017-03-01541406410.33134/eeja.155145Responding to Aesthetic ReasonsAndrew McGonigal0Department of Philosophy, Washington and Lee University, Washington Hall 319, Lexington, VA 24450What makes a certain consideration an aesthetic reason rather than a reason of some other kind? Is it a solely a matter of the kind of attitude or activity that the reason supports? How fundamental or structural are such reasons? Do they contrast in a natural way with epistemic or practical reasons? Is skilled aesthetic achievement, whether interpretative or creative, a matter of recognizing the aesthetic reasons we have for a given response, and correctly according with such reasons? In this paper, I offer a preliminary discussion of these topics. I argue that our account of aesthetic reasons should respect the fact that they play an important regulative role, over and above directly supporting aesthetic response. Such a role allows aesthetic reasons to moderate a wide range of practical and epistemic activities, but not by adding or substituting distinctively aesthetic ends or purposes for such activities. I then go on to argue against the view that skilled aesthetic achievement consists in correct recognition of and accord with aesthetic reasons, adapting a recent argument of Timothy Williamson’s.https://estetikajournal.org/articles/155
spellingShingle Andrew McGonigal
Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
Estetika
title Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
title_full Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
title_fullStr Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
title_full_unstemmed Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
title_short Responding to Aesthetic Reasons
title_sort responding to aesthetic reasons
url https://estetikajournal.org/articles/155
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmcgonigal respondingtoaestheticreasons