Bias and unclear outcomes in clinical trials of diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional analysis of literature
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are well-designed papers that aim to answer questions in the real world. However, sometimes they present missing, dubious and unclear outcomes that make it difficult to apply in practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to evaluate the way and the frequency with...
Main Authors: | Vania Mozetic, Valéria Mozetic de Barros, Lucas Denadai, Matheus Ferreira Santos da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos da Cruz, Nilva Simeren Bueno de Moraes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/evidence/article/view/3415 |
Similar Items
-
Risk of bias analysis in diabetic retinopathy randomized clinical trials evaluated by RoB-1 tool from Cochrane systematic reviews
by: Vânia Mozetic, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
A warning to readers about the term metanalysis in non-systematic reviews about diabetic retinopathy: documental study
by: Vania Mozetic, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Analysis of Cochrane Systematic Reviews about retinopathy of prematurity
by: Vânia Mozetic, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Retinopathy Phenotypes in Type 2 Diabetes with Different Risks for Macular Edema and Proliferative Retinopathy
by: Ines P. Marques, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Effects of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
by: Ribeiro de Carvalho G, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)