Contrasting multistage and computer-based testing: score accuracy and aberrant responding
The goal of the present study was to compare and contrast the efficacy of a multistage testing (MST) design using three paths compared to a traditional computer-based testing (CBT) approach involving items across all ability levels. Participants were n = 627 individuals who were subjected to both a...
Main Authors: | Georgios Sideridis, Hanan Ghamdi, Omar Zamil |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288177/full |
Similar Items
-
Estimation of Person Ability under Rapid and Effortful Responding
by: Georgios Sideridis, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The Impact of Non-Attempted and Dually-Attempted Items on Person Abilities and Scale Validity using Item Response Theory
by: Georgios D. Sideridis, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Identifying person misfit using the person backward stepwise reliability curve (PBRC)
by: Georgios Sideridis, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
The Response Entropy Index: Comparative Assessment of Performance and Cultural Bias across Indices of Careless Responding
by: John Tawa
Published: (2021-08-01) -
The Relationship of Insufficient Effort Responding and Response Styles: An Online Experiment
by: Gene M. Alarcon, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)