An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars
Background: To overcome some of the disadvantages of the current primary root canal obturating materials, there is a continued interest in search for chemical compounds with broader and more effective antibacterial action and less cytotoxicity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare in vivo t...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=4;spage=398;epage=403;aulast=Vachhani |
| _version_ | 1797775523673276416 |
|---|---|
| author | Krishnaben Vachhani Dinesh Rao Sunil Panwar Surabhi Gupta |
| author_facet | Krishnaben Vachhani Dinesh Rao Sunil Panwar Surabhi Gupta |
| author_sort | Krishnaben Vachhani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: To overcome some of the disadvantages of the current primary root canal obturating materials, there is a continued interest in search for chemical compounds with broader and more effective antibacterial action and less cytotoxicity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare in vivo the clinical and radiographic success of mixtures of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) as obturating materials in pulpectomy of primary molars. Settings and Design: This was an in vivo randomized controlled clinical trial. Materials and Methods: Ninety primary molars selected were randomly divided into three groups. Group A was obturated with zinc oxide–O. sanctum extract, Group B with zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and Group C with ZOE. All the groups were evaluated for success or failure based on clinical and radiographic criteria at the end of 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical Analysis Used: The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the first and the second co-investigators was calculated by Cohen's kappa statistic. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test, P ≤ 0.05 (indicates statistical significance). Results: By the end of 12 months, the overall clinical success rate was 88%, 95.7%, and 90.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively; whereas the radiographic success rate was found to be 80%, 91.3%, and 86.4% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: On the basis of the overall success rates of all the three obturating materials, the following order of performance can be concluded: zinc oxide–ozonated oil > ZOE > zinc oxide–O. sanctum extract. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:36:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f43e2790590646c6932eaffa9015785b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-4388 1998-3905 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:36:58Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-f43e2790590646c6932eaffa9015785b2023-07-21T11:45:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052022-01-0140439840310.4103/jisppd.jisppd_204_22An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molarsKrishnaben VachhaniDinesh RaoSunil PanwarSurabhi GuptaBackground: To overcome some of the disadvantages of the current primary root canal obturating materials, there is a continued interest in search for chemical compounds with broader and more effective antibacterial action and less cytotoxicity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare in vivo the clinical and radiographic success of mixtures of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol (ZOE) as obturating materials in pulpectomy of primary molars. Settings and Design: This was an in vivo randomized controlled clinical trial. Materials and Methods: Ninety primary molars selected were randomly divided into three groups. Group A was obturated with zinc oxide–O. sanctum extract, Group B with zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and Group C with ZOE. All the groups were evaluated for success or failure based on clinical and radiographic criteria at the end of 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical Analysis Used: The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the first and the second co-investigators was calculated by Cohen's kappa statistic. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test, P ≤ 0.05 (indicates statistical significance). Results: By the end of 12 months, the overall clinical success rate was 88%, 95.7%, and 90.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively; whereas the radiographic success rate was found to be 80%, 91.3%, and 86.4% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: On the basis of the overall success rates of all the three obturating materials, the following order of performance can be concluded: zinc oxide–ozonated oil > ZOE > zinc oxide–O. sanctum extract.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=4;spage=398;epage=403;aulast=Vachhaniclinical success rateradiographic success ratezinc oxide–eugenolzinc oxide–ocimum sanctum extractzinc oxide–ozonated oil |
| spellingShingle | Krishnaben Vachhani Dinesh Rao Sunil Panwar Surabhi Gupta An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry clinical success rate radiographic success rate zinc oxide–eugenol zinc oxide–ocimum sanctum extract zinc oxide–ozonated oil |
| title | An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| title_full | An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| title_fullStr | An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| title_full_unstemmed | An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| title_short | An in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide–Ocimum sanctum extract, zinc oxide–ozonated oil, and zinc oxide–eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| title_sort | in vivo comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide ocimum sanctum extract zinc oxide ozonated oil and zinc oxide eugenol as obturating materials in primary molars |
| topic | clinical success rate radiographic success rate zinc oxide–eugenol zinc oxide–ocimum sanctum extract zinc oxide–ozonated oil |
| url | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2022;volume=40;issue=4;spage=398;epage=403;aulast=Vachhani |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnabenvachhani aninvivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT dineshrao aninvivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT sunilpanwar aninvivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT surabhigupta aninvivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT krishnabenvachhani invivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT dineshrao invivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT sunilpanwar invivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars AT surabhigupta invivocomparativeclinicalandradiographicevaluationofamixtureofzincoxideocimumsanctumextractzincoxideozonatedoilandzincoxideeugenolasobturatingmaterialsinprimarymolars |