The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations
An insurance policy may not only affect the consequences for victims but also for perpetrators. In six experiments we find that people recommend milder punishments for perpetrators when the victim was insured, although people believe that a sentence should not depend on the victim’s insurance status...
Main Authors: | Philippe P. F. M. van de Calseyde, Gideon Keren, Marcel Zeelenberg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2013-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500005088/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations
by: Philippe P. F. M. van de Calseyde, et al.
Published: (2013-03-01) -
Reconstruction of Restitution as an Additional Punishment for Victims of Criminal Acts
by: Nurini Aprilianda, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
Utmost good faith principle in Indonesian insurance law as a legal reason to harm the insured party
by: Mulhadi Mulhadi, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
by: Rachmadan Eka Cipta, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Environmental Insurance: Insurable Risks and Losses Subject to Compensation
by: Yury A. Spletukhov
Published: (2023-04-01)