Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda

ABSTRACT In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francisco José Roma Paumgartten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo
Series:Revista de Saúde Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102016000200604&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818481856102793216
author Francisco José Roma Paumgartten
author_facet Francisco José Roma Paumgartten
author_sort Francisco José Roma Paumgartten
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry expenditure to persuade legislators and government officials of their viewpoints and to influence decision-making according to commercial interests. Since 1990, however, the Associação da Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa (Interfarma – Pharmaceutical Research Industry Association), Brazilian counterpart of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), main lobbying organization of the US pharmaceutical industry, has played a major role in the advocacy of interests of major drug companies. The main goals of Interfarma lobbying activities are: shortening the average time taken by the Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) to approve marketing authorization for a new drug; making the criteria for incorporation of new drugs into SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) more flexible and speeding up technology incorporation; changing the Country’s ethical clearance system and the ethical requirements for clinical trials to meet the need of the innovative drug industry, and establishing a National Policy for Rare Diseases that allows a prompt incorporation of orphan drugs into SUS. Although lobbying affects community health and well-being, this topic is not in the public health research agenda. The impacts of pharmaceutical lobbying on health policies and health-care costs are of great importance for SUS and deserve to be investigated.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:40:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f44b570466af4028a4cbf3e095e531eb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1518-8787
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:40:40Z
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Revista de Saúde Pública
spelling doaj.art-f44b570466af4028a4cbf3e095e531eb2022-12-22T01:50:15ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública1518-878750010.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006508S0034-89102016000200604Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agendaFrancisco José Roma PaumgarttenABSTRACT In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry expenditure to persuade legislators and government officials of their viewpoints and to influence decision-making according to commercial interests. Since 1990, however, the Associação da Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa (Interfarma – Pharmaceutical Research Industry Association), Brazilian counterpart of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), main lobbying organization of the US pharmaceutical industry, has played a major role in the advocacy of interests of major drug companies. The main goals of Interfarma lobbying activities are: shortening the average time taken by the Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) to approve marketing authorization for a new drug; making the criteria for incorporation of new drugs into SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) more flexible and speeding up technology incorporation; changing the Country’s ethical clearance system and the ethical requirements for clinical trials to meet the need of the innovative drug industry, and establishing a National Policy for Rare Diseases that allows a prompt incorporation of orphan drugs into SUS. Although lobbying affects community health and well-being, this topic is not in the public health research agenda. The impacts of pharmaceutical lobbying on health policies and health-care costs are of great importance for SUS and deserve to be investigated.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102016000200604&lng=en&tlng=enOrphan Drug Production, legislation and jurisprudenceDrug IndustryDrug EvaluationDrug ApprovalProducts RegistrationHealth PrioritiesConflict of Interest, Lobbying
spellingShingle Francisco José Roma Paumgartten
Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
Revista de Saúde Pública
Orphan Drug Production, legislation and jurisprudence
Drug Industry
Drug Evaluation
Drug Approval
Products Registration
Health Priorities
Conflict of Interest, Lobbying
title Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_full Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_fullStr Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_short Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_sort pharmaceutical lobbying in brazil a missing topic in the public health research agenda
topic Orphan Drug Production, legislation and jurisprudence
Drug Industry
Drug Evaluation
Drug Approval
Products Registration
Health Priorities
Conflict of Interest, Lobbying
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102016000200604&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscojoseromapaumgartten pharmaceuticallobbyinginbrazilamissingtopicinthepublichealthresearchagenda