Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs

Abstract Background Small non-coding (s)RNAs are involved in the negative regulation of gene expression, playing critical roles in genome integrity, development and metabolic pathways. Targeting of RNAs by ribonucleoprotein complexes of sRNAs bound to Argonaute (AGO) proteins results in cleaved RNAs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chenna Swetha, Anushree Narjala, Awadhesh Pandit, Varsha Tirumalai, P. V. Shivaprasad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08288-5
_version_ 1798026544351805440
author Chenna Swetha
Anushree Narjala
Awadhesh Pandit
Varsha Tirumalai
P. V. Shivaprasad
author_facet Chenna Swetha
Anushree Narjala
Awadhesh Pandit
Varsha Tirumalai
P. V. Shivaprasad
author_sort Chenna Swetha
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Small non-coding (s)RNAs are involved in the negative regulation of gene expression, playing critical roles in genome integrity, development and metabolic pathways. Targeting of RNAs by ribonucleoprotein complexes of sRNAs bound to Argonaute (AGO) proteins results in cleaved RNAs having precise and predictable 5` ends. While tools to study sliced bits of RNAs to confirm the efficiency of sRNA-mediated regulation are available, they are sub-optimal. In this study, we provide an improvised version of a tool with better efficiency to accurately validate sRNA targets. Results Here, we improvised the CleaveLand tool to identify additional micro (mi)RNA targets that belong to the same family and also other targets within a specified free energy cut-off. These additional targets were otherwise excluded during the default run. We employed these tools to understand the sRNA targeting efficiency in wild and cultivated rice, sequenced degradome from two rice lines, O. nivara and O. sativa indica Pusa Basmati-1 and analyzed variations in sRNA targeting. Our results indicate the existence of multiple miRNA-mediated targeting differences between domesticated and wild species. For example, Os5NG4 was targeted only in wild rice that might be responsible for the poor secondary wall formation when compared to cultivated rice. We also identified differential mRNA targets of secondary sRNAs that were generated after miRNA-mediated cleavage of primary targets. Conclusions We identified many differentially targeted mRNAs between wild and domesticated rice lines. In addition to providing a step-wise guide to generate and analyze degradome datasets, we showed how domestication altered sRNA-mediated cascade silencing during the evolution of indica rice.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:37:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f451ac952b894a7fbbc3ba9f3adcea85
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2164
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:37:02Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Genomics
spelling doaj.art-f451ac952b894a7fbbc3ba9f3adcea852022-12-22T04:09:13ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642022-01-0123111710.1186/s12864-021-08288-5Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAsChenna Swetha0Anushree Narjala1Awadhesh Pandit2Varsha Tirumalai3P. V. Shivaprasad4National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchAbstract Background Small non-coding (s)RNAs are involved in the negative regulation of gene expression, playing critical roles in genome integrity, development and metabolic pathways. Targeting of RNAs by ribonucleoprotein complexes of sRNAs bound to Argonaute (AGO) proteins results in cleaved RNAs having precise and predictable 5` ends. While tools to study sliced bits of RNAs to confirm the efficiency of sRNA-mediated regulation are available, they are sub-optimal. In this study, we provide an improvised version of a tool with better efficiency to accurately validate sRNA targets. Results Here, we improvised the CleaveLand tool to identify additional micro (mi)RNA targets that belong to the same family and also other targets within a specified free energy cut-off. These additional targets were otherwise excluded during the default run. We employed these tools to understand the sRNA targeting efficiency in wild and cultivated rice, sequenced degradome from two rice lines, O. nivara and O. sativa indica Pusa Basmati-1 and analyzed variations in sRNA targeting. Our results indicate the existence of multiple miRNA-mediated targeting differences between domesticated and wild species. For example, Os5NG4 was targeted only in wild rice that might be responsible for the poor secondary wall formation when compared to cultivated rice. We also identified differential mRNA targets of secondary sRNAs that were generated after miRNA-mediated cleavage of primary targets. Conclusions We identified many differentially targeted mRNAs between wild and domesticated rice lines. In addition to providing a step-wise guide to generate and analyze degradome datasets, we showed how domestication altered sRNA-mediated cascade silencing during the evolution of indica rice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08288-5DegradomemiRNAO. nivaraO. sativa indica Pusa Basmati-1Domestication
spellingShingle Chenna Swetha
Anushree Narjala
Awadhesh Pandit
Varsha Tirumalai
P. V. Shivaprasad
Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
BMC Genomics
Degradome
miRNA
O. nivara
O. sativa indica Pusa Basmati-1
Domestication
title Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
title_full Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
title_fullStr Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
title_full_unstemmed Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
title_short Degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by miRNAs
title_sort degradome comparison between wild and cultivated rice identifies differential targeting by mirnas
topic Degradome
miRNA
O. nivara
O. sativa indica Pusa Basmati-1
Domestication
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08288-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chennaswetha degradomecomparisonbetweenwildandcultivatedriceidentifiesdifferentialtargetingbymirnas
AT anushreenarjala degradomecomparisonbetweenwildandcultivatedriceidentifiesdifferentialtargetingbymirnas
AT awadheshpandit degradomecomparisonbetweenwildandcultivatedriceidentifiesdifferentialtargetingbymirnas
AT varshatirumalai degradomecomparisonbetweenwildandcultivatedriceidentifiesdifferentialtargetingbymirnas
AT pvshivaprasad degradomecomparisonbetweenwildandcultivatedriceidentifiesdifferentialtargetingbymirnas