Time for sharing data to become routine: the seven excuses for not doing so are all invalid [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Data are more valuable than scientific papers but researchers are incentivised to publish papers not share data. Patients are the main beneficiaries of data sharing but researchers have several incentives not to share: others might use their data to get ahead in the academic rat race; they might be...
Main Authors: | Richard Smith, Ian Roberts |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-04-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/5-781/v1 |
Similar Items
-
FAIRness in scientific publishing [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Philippa C. Matthews
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Evaluation of unique identifiers used for citation linking [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Heidi Holst Madsen, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Imagining tomorrow's university in an era of open science [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Adina Howe, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-04-01)