THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
Abstract Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the compe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Mimbar Hukum |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284 |
_version_ | 1828554655351701504 |
---|---|
author | Francisca Romana Harjiyatni |
author_facet | Francisca Romana Harjiyatni |
author_sort | Francisca Romana Harjiyatni |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract
Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and
decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide a dispute whose object is a fictive positive KTUN. The provision of the positive decision in the Law No. 30 of 2014 provides fairer legal protection to both procedural justice and substantive justice. However, the force power of the court to execute decision remains low. Consequently, a fair legal protection to the dispute of positive KTUN per the Law No. 30 of 2014 is not optimal.
Intisari
Berdasarkan UU PTUN, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif negatif. Setelah berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif positif. Ketentuan KTUN fiktif positif dalam UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 lebih memberikan perlindungan hukum yang adil baik keadilan prosedural maupun keadilan substansial, namun dalam hal daya paksa pelaksanaan masih rendah maka perlindungan hukum yang adil dalam sengketa KTUN fiktif positif berdasarkan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 menjadi tidak optimal. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:39:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f45a16c7b8fa4759a73fb06a55eb6d71 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0852-100X 2443-0994 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:39:40Z |
publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
publisher | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
record_format | Article |
series | Mimbar Hukum |
spelling | doaj.art-f45a16c7b8fa4759a73fb06a55eb6d712022-12-22T00:35:58ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaMimbar Hukum0852-100X2443-09942017-06-0129237638910.22146/jmh.2328417915THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUNFrancisca Romana Harjiyatni0Universitas JanabadraAbstract Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide a dispute whose object is a fictive positive KTUN. The provision of the positive decision in the Law No. 30 of 2014 provides fairer legal protection to both procedural justice and substantive justice. However, the force power of the court to execute decision remains low. Consequently, a fair legal protection to the dispute of positive KTUN per the Law No. 30 of 2014 is not optimal. Intisari Berdasarkan UU PTUN, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif negatif. Setelah berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif positif. Ketentuan KTUN fiktif positif dalam UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 lebih memberikan perlindungan hukum yang adil baik keadilan prosedural maupun keadilan substansial, namun dalam hal daya paksa pelaksanaan masih rendah maka perlindungan hukum yang adil dalam sengketa KTUN fiktif positif berdasarkan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 menjadi tidak optimal.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284: absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision |
spellingShingle | Francisca Romana Harjiyatni THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN Mimbar Hukum : absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision |
title | THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN |
title_full | THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN |
title_fullStr | THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN |
title_full_unstemmed | THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN |
title_short | THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN |
title_sort | absolute competence of the jurisdiction of the administrative court in a dispute whose object is a fictive positive ktun |
topic | : absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision |
url | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franciscaromanaharjiyatni theabsolutecompetenceofthejurisdictionoftheadministrativecourtinadisputewhoseobjectisafictivepositivektun AT franciscaromanaharjiyatni absolutecompetenceofthejurisdictionoftheadministrativecourtinadisputewhoseobjectisafictivepositivektun |