THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN

Abstract Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the compe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2017-06-01
Series:Mimbar Hukum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284
_version_ 1828554655351701504
author Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
author_facet Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
author_sort Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide a dispute whose object is a fictive positive KTUN. The provision of the positive decision in the Law No. 30 of 2014 provides fairer legal protection to both procedural justice and substantive justice. However, the force power of the court to execute decision remains low. Consequently, a fair legal protection to the dispute of positive KTUN per the Law No. 30 of 2014 is not optimal. Intisari Berdasarkan UU PTUN, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif negatif. Setelah berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif positif. Ketentuan KTUN fiktif positif dalam UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 lebih memberikan perlindungan hukum yang adil baik keadilan prosedural maupun keadilan substansial, namun dalam hal daya paksa pelaksanaan masih rendah maka perlindungan hukum yang adil dalam sengketa KTUN fiktif positif berdasarkan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 menjadi tidak optimal.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:39:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f45a16c7b8fa4759a73fb06a55eb6d71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0852-100X
2443-0994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:39:40Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format Article
series Mimbar Hukum
spelling doaj.art-f45a16c7b8fa4759a73fb06a55eb6d712022-12-22T00:35:58ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaMimbar Hukum0852-100X2443-09942017-06-0129237638910.22146/jmh.2328417915THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUNFrancisca Romana Harjiyatni0Universitas JanabadraAbstract Based on the Law on Administrative Court, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide upon a dispute whose object is a fictive- negative decision (KTUN). After the enactment of the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, the Administrative Court has the competence to examine and decide a dispute whose object is a fictive positive KTUN. The provision of the positive decision in the Law No. 30 of 2014 provides fairer legal protection to both procedural justice and substantive justice. However, the force power of the court to execute decision remains low. Consequently, a fair legal protection to the dispute of positive KTUN per the Law No. 30 of 2014 is not optimal. Intisari Berdasarkan UU PTUN, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif negatif. Setelah berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, PTUN mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa dan memutus sengketa yang obyeknya KTUN fiktif positif. Ketentuan KTUN fiktif positif dalam UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 lebih memberikan perlindungan hukum yang adil baik keadilan prosedural maupun keadilan substansial, namun dalam hal daya paksa pelaksanaan masih rendah maka perlindungan hukum yang adil dalam sengketa KTUN fiktif positif berdasarkan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 menjadi tidak optimal.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284: absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision
spellingShingle Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
Mimbar Hukum
: absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision
title THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
title_full THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
title_fullStr THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
title_full_unstemmed THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
title_short THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN A DISPUTE WHOSE OBJECT IS A FICTIVE-POSITIVE KTUN
title_sort absolute competence of the jurisdiction of the administrative court in a dispute whose object is a fictive positive ktun
topic : absolute competence, administrative court, positive decision
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/23284
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscaromanaharjiyatni theabsolutecompetenceofthejurisdictionoftheadministrativecourtinadisputewhoseobjectisafictivepositivektun
AT franciscaromanaharjiyatni absolutecompetenceofthejurisdictionoftheadministrativecourtinadisputewhoseobjectisafictivepositivektun