Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
Several recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to v...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1828429764895965184 |
---|---|
author | Tomiko Yakura Hiroki Yokota Yusuke Ohmichi Mika Ohmichi Takashi Nakano Munekazu Naito |
author_facet | Tomiko Yakura Hiroki Yokota Yusuke Ohmichi Mika Ohmichi Takashi Nakano Munekazu Naito |
author_sort | Tomiko Yakura |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Several recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to visually recognize mirror, video-recorded, and still images and to discriminate between images of males and females. Rats were tested in a place preference apparatus with a mirror, a video-recorded image of a rat, or a still image of a rat at one end. The data were assessed using t-test with Bonferroni correction. Male and female rats spent significantly more time in the mirror chamber and the video-recorded image chamber than in their respective blank chambers (P < 0.05), and male rats also spent more time in the chamber containing a still image. Furthermore, it was found that male rats exhibited significantly more sniffing behavior around the mirror than in the blank chamber (P < 0.05), whereas female rats were no significant differences in the sniffing behaviors in the mirror, moving or still image experiments. Identical results were obtained regardless of whether the rat in the image was the same or opposite sex. These results indicate that rats can process the differences in mirror, video-recorded, and still images as visual information, but are unable to use this information to distinguish between the sexes. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T17:38:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f465fd1929564964a054c523d3674f73 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T17:38:02Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-f465fd1929564964a054c523d3674f732022-12-22T01:39:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019421510.1371/journal.pone.0194215Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.Tomiko YakuraHiroki YokotaYusuke OhmichiMika OhmichiTakashi NakanoMunekazu NaitoSeveral recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to visually recognize mirror, video-recorded, and still images and to discriminate between images of males and females. Rats were tested in a place preference apparatus with a mirror, a video-recorded image of a rat, or a still image of a rat at one end. The data were assessed using t-test with Bonferroni correction. Male and female rats spent significantly more time in the mirror chamber and the video-recorded image chamber than in their respective blank chambers (P < 0.05), and male rats also spent more time in the chamber containing a still image. Furthermore, it was found that male rats exhibited significantly more sniffing behavior around the mirror than in the blank chamber (P < 0.05), whereas female rats were no significant differences in the sniffing behaviors in the mirror, moving or still image experiments. Identical results were obtained regardless of whether the rat in the image was the same or opposite sex. These results indicate that rats can process the differences in mirror, video-recorded, and still images as visual information, but are unable to use this information to distinguish between the sexes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Tomiko Yakura Hiroki Yokota Yusuke Ohmichi Mika Ohmichi Takashi Nakano Munekazu Naito Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. PLoS ONE |
title | Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. |
title_full | Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. |
title_fullStr | Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. |
title_short | Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats. |
title_sort | visual recognition of mirror video recorded and still images in rats |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomikoyakura visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats AT hirokiyokota visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats AT yusukeohmichi visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats AT mikaohmichi visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats AT takashinakano visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats AT munekazunaito visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats |