Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.

Several recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomiko Yakura, Hiroki Yokota, Yusuke Ohmichi, Mika Ohmichi, Takashi Nakano, Munekazu Naito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render
_version_ 1828429764895965184
author Tomiko Yakura
Hiroki Yokota
Yusuke Ohmichi
Mika Ohmichi
Takashi Nakano
Munekazu Naito
author_facet Tomiko Yakura
Hiroki Yokota
Yusuke Ohmichi
Mika Ohmichi
Takashi Nakano
Munekazu Naito
author_sort Tomiko Yakura
collection DOAJ
description Several recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to visually recognize mirror, video-recorded, and still images and to discriminate between images of males and females. Rats were tested in a place preference apparatus with a mirror, a video-recorded image of a rat, or a still image of a rat at one end. The data were assessed using t-test with Bonferroni correction. Male and female rats spent significantly more time in the mirror chamber and the video-recorded image chamber than in their respective blank chambers (P < 0.05), and male rats also spent more time in the chamber containing a still image. Furthermore, it was found that male rats exhibited significantly more sniffing behavior around the mirror than in the blank chamber (P < 0.05), whereas female rats were no significant differences in the sniffing behaviors in the mirror, moving or still image experiments. Identical results were obtained regardless of whether the rat in the image was the same or opposite sex. These results indicate that rats can process the differences in mirror, video-recorded, and still images as visual information, but are unable to use this information to distinguish between the sexes.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:38:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f465fd1929564964a054c523d3674f73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:38:02Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f465fd1929564964a054c523d3674f732022-12-22T01:39:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019421510.1371/journal.pone.0194215Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.Tomiko YakuraHiroki YokotaYusuke OhmichiMika OhmichiTakashi NakanoMunekazu NaitoSeveral recent studies have claimed that rodents have good visual recognition abilities. However, the extent to which rats can recognize other rats and distinguish between males and females using visual information alone remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of rats to visually recognize mirror, video-recorded, and still images and to discriminate between images of males and females. Rats were tested in a place preference apparatus with a mirror, a video-recorded image of a rat, or a still image of a rat at one end. The data were assessed using t-test with Bonferroni correction. Male and female rats spent significantly more time in the mirror chamber and the video-recorded image chamber than in their respective blank chambers (P < 0.05), and male rats also spent more time in the chamber containing a still image. Furthermore, it was found that male rats exhibited significantly more sniffing behavior around the mirror than in the blank chamber (P < 0.05), whereas female rats were no significant differences in the sniffing behaviors in the mirror, moving or still image experiments. Identical results were obtained regardless of whether the rat in the image was the same or opposite sex. These results indicate that rats can process the differences in mirror, video-recorded, and still images as visual information, but are unable to use this information to distinguish between the sexes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render
spellingShingle Tomiko Yakura
Hiroki Yokota
Yusuke Ohmichi
Mika Ohmichi
Takashi Nakano
Munekazu Naito
Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
PLoS ONE
title Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
title_full Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
title_fullStr Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
title_full_unstemmed Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
title_short Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
title_sort visual recognition of mirror video recorded and still images in rats
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5849344?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tomikoyakura visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats
AT hirokiyokota visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats
AT yusukeohmichi visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats
AT mikaohmichi visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats
AT takashinakano visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats
AT munekazunaito visualrecognitionofmirrorvideorecordedandstillimagesinrats