Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
This study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Formosan Medical Association |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572 |
_version_ | 1819148928607584256 |
---|---|
author | Jui-Ting Hsu Yen-Wen Shen Chih-Wei Kuo Ruei-Teng Wang Lih-Jyh Fuh Heng-Li Huang |
author_facet | Jui-Ting Hsu Yen-Wen Shen Chih-Wei Kuo Ruei-Teng Wang Lih-Jyh Fuh Heng-Li Huang |
author_sort | Jui-Ting Hsu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as their correlations were also evaluated.
Methods: Dental implants with diameters of 3.75, 4, 5, and 6 mm and artificial bone specimens were scanned by microcomputed tomography to construct 3D models for calculating pBICA, BICA, and 3D BIC%. Indexes of the primary implant stability including the insertion torque value (ITV), Periotest value (PTV), and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured after implants with various diameters were placed into bone specimens. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni adjustment, and Spearman correlations were all performed as statistical and correlation analyses.
Results: The implant diameter significantly influenced pBICA and BICA, but not 3D BIC%. ITV and PTV were more sensitive to implant diameter than was ISQ. The coefficients of determination were high (>0.92) for the correlations between pBICA (or BICA) and indexes of the primary implant stability.
Conclusion: This study revealed how the implant diameter and the three-dimensional (3D) BIC influence the primary stabilities of dental implant. ITV and PTV were more sensitively influenced by the implant diameter than ISQ. The pBICA and BICA seem to be more important than 3D BIC % for using wider implant in treatment plan, since those two parameters are highly predictive of variations in the primary stability of dental implant. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:53:30Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f473e5caa5014db0bb1f6e6fd2ca4b9e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0929-6646 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:53:30Z |
publishDate | 2017-08-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of the Formosan Medical Association |
spelling | doaj.art-f473e5caa5014db0bb1f6e6fd2ca4b9e2022-12-21T18:23:37ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462017-08-01116858259010.1016/j.jfma.2017.05.005Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implantJui-Ting Hsu0Yen-Wen Shen1Chih-Wei Kuo2Ruei-Teng Wang3Lih-Jyh Fuh4Heng-Li Huang5School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanMaterials & Electro-Optics Research Division, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology, Taoyuan City, TaiwanMaterials & Electro-Optics Research Division, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology, Taoyuan City, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanThis study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as their correlations were also evaluated. Methods: Dental implants with diameters of 3.75, 4, 5, and 6 mm and artificial bone specimens were scanned by microcomputed tomography to construct 3D models for calculating pBICA, BICA, and 3D BIC%. Indexes of the primary implant stability including the insertion torque value (ITV), Periotest value (PTV), and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured after implants with various diameters were placed into bone specimens. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni adjustment, and Spearman correlations were all performed as statistical and correlation analyses. Results: The implant diameter significantly influenced pBICA and BICA, but not 3D BIC%. ITV and PTV were more sensitive to implant diameter than was ISQ. The coefficients of determination were high (>0.92) for the correlations between pBICA (or BICA) and indexes of the primary implant stability. Conclusion: This study revealed how the implant diameter and the three-dimensional (3D) BIC influence the primary stabilities of dental implant. ITV and PTV were more sensitively influenced by the implant diameter than ISQ. The pBICA and BICA seem to be more important than 3D BIC % for using wider implant in treatment plan, since those two parameters are highly predictive of variations in the primary stability of dental implant.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572Microcomputed tomographyImplant diameter3D bone-to-implant contactInsertion torquePeriotestImplant stability quotient |
spellingShingle | Jui-Ting Hsu Yen-Wen Shen Chih-Wei Kuo Ruei-Teng Wang Lih-Jyh Fuh Heng-Li Huang Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Microcomputed tomography Implant diameter 3D bone-to-implant contact Insertion torque Periotest Implant stability quotient |
title | Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
title_full | Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
title_fullStr | Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
title_short | Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
title_sort | impacts of 3d bone to implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant |
topic | Microcomputed tomography Implant diameter 3D bone-to-implant contact Insertion torque Periotest Implant stability quotient |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juitinghsu impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant AT yenwenshen impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant AT chihweikuo impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant AT rueitengwang impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant AT lihjyhfuh impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant AT henglihuang impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant |