Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant

This study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jui-Ting Hsu, Yen-Wen Shen, Chih-Wei Kuo, Ruei-Teng Wang, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Heng-Li Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-08-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572
_version_ 1819148928607584256
author Jui-Ting Hsu
Yen-Wen Shen
Chih-Wei Kuo
Ruei-Teng Wang
Lih-Jyh Fuh
Heng-Li Huang
author_facet Jui-Ting Hsu
Yen-Wen Shen
Chih-Wei Kuo
Ruei-Teng Wang
Lih-Jyh Fuh
Heng-Li Huang
author_sort Jui-Ting Hsu
collection DOAJ
description This study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as their correlations were also evaluated. Methods: Dental implants with diameters of 3.75, 4, 5, and 6 mm and artificial bone specimens were scanned by microcomputed tomography to construct 3D models for calculating pBICA, BICA, and 3D BIC%. Indexes of the primary implant stability including the insertion torque value (ITV), Periotest value (PTV), and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured after implants with various diameters were placed into bone specimens. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni adjustment, and Spearman correlations were all performed as statistical and correlation analyses. Results: The implant diameter significantly influenced pBICA and BICA, but not 3D BIC%. ITV and PTV were more sensitive to implant diameter than was ISQ. The coefficients of determination were high (>0.92) for the correlations between pBICA (or BICA) and indexes of the primary implant stability. Conclusion: This study revealed how the implant diameter and the three-dimensional (3D) BIC influence the primary stabilities of dental implant. ITV and PTV were more sensitively influenced by the implant diameter than ISQ. The pBICA and BICA seem to be more important than 3D BIC % for using wider implant in treatment plan, since those two parameters are highly predictive of variations in the primary stability of dental implant.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:53:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f473e5caa5014db0bb1f6e6fd2ca4b9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6646
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:53:30Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-f473e5caa5014db0bb1f6e6fd2ca4b9e2022-12-21T18:23:37ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462017-08-01116858259010.1016/j.jfma.2017.05.005Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implantJui-Ting Hsu0Yen-Wen Shen1Chih-Wei Kuo2Ruei-Teng Wang3Lih-Jyh Fuh4Heng-Li Huang5School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanMaterials & Electro-Optics Research Division, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology, Taoyuan City, TaiwanMaterials & Electro-Optics Research Division, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology, Taoyuan City, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanThis study investigated the effects of three three-dimensional (3D) bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameters—potential BIC area (pBICA), BIC area (BICA), and 3D BIC percentage (3D BIC%; defined as BICA divided by pBICA)—in relation to the implant diameter on primary implant stability, as well as their correlations were also evaluated. Methods: Dental implants with diameters of 3.75, 4, 5, and 6 mm and artificial bone specimens were scanned by microcomputed tomography to construct 3D models for calculating pBICA, BICA, and 3D BIC%. Indexes of the primary implant stability including the insertion torque value (ITV), Periotest value (PTV), and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured after implants with various diameters were placed into bone specimens. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni adjustment, and Spearman correlations were all performed as statistical and correlation analyses. Results: The implant diameter significantly influenced pBICA and BICA, but not 3D BIC%. ITV and PTV were more sensitive to implant diameter than was ISQ. The coefficients of determination were high (>0.92) for the correlations between pBICA (or BICA) and indexes of the primary implant stability. Conclusion: This study revealed how the implant diameter and the three-dimensional (3D) BIC influence the primary stabilities of dental implant. ITV and PTV were more sensitively influenced by the implant diameter than ISQ. The pBICA and BICA seem to be more important than 3D BIC % for using wider implant in treatment plan, since those two parameters are highly predictive of variations in the primary stability of dental implant.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572Microcomputed tomographyImplant diameter3D bone-to-implant contactInsertion torquePeriotestImplant stability quotient
spellingShingle Jui-Ting Hsu
Yen-Wen Shen
Chih-Wei Kuo
Ruei-Teng Wang
Lih-Jyh Fuh
Heng-Li Huang
Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Microcomputed tomography
Implant diameter
3D bone-to-implant contact
Insertion torque
Periotest
Implant stability quotient
title Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
title_full Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
title_fullStr Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
title_short Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
title_sort impacts of 3d bone to implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant
topic Microcomputed tomography
Implant diameter
3D bone-to-implant contact
Insertion torque
Periotest
Implant stability quotient
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301572
work_keys_str_mv AT juitinghsu impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant
AT yenwenshen impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant
AT chihweikuo impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant
AT rueitengwang impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant
AT lihjyhfuh impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant
AT henglihuang impactsof3dbonetoimplantcontactandimplantdiameteronprimarystabilityofdentalimplant