Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20

The commented judgment concerns the admissibility of repackaging medicinal products in parallel trade. It was issued in connection with new EU regulations aimed at counteracting the counterfeiting of such products. The Court examined how the regulations in question affect the scope of rights enjoye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krzysztof Dobieżyński
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2023-09-01
Series:Studia Prawnicze KUL
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/sp/article/view/15132
_version_ 1797667211440029696
author Krzysztof Dobieżyński
author_facet Krzysztof Dobieżyński
author_sort Krzysztof Dobieżyński
collection DOAJ
description The commented judgment concerns the admissibility of repackaging medicinal products in parallel trade. It was issued in connection with new EU regulations aimed at counteracting the counterfeiting of such products. The Court examined how the regulations in question affect the scope of rights enjoyed by the owners of trademarks affixed to products, as well as the rights of entrepreneurs engaged in parallel trade.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T20:10:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4847b2aea2e422b865024dd2fcd1275
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1897-7146
2719-4264
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T20:10:57Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series Studia Prawnicze KUL
spelling doaj.art-f4847b2aea2e422b865024dd2fcd12752023-10-03T12:11:43ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinStudia Prawnicze KUL1897-71462719-42642023-09-01310.31743/sp.15132Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20Krzysztof Dobieżyński0The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin The commented judgment concerns the admissibility of repackaging medicinal products in parallel trade. It was issued in connection with new EU regulations aimed at counteracting the counterfeiting of such products. The Court examined how the regulations in question affect the scope of rights enjoyed by the owners of trademarks affixed to products, as well as the rights of entrepreneurs engaged in parallel trade. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/sp/article/view/15132free movement of goodsintellectual propertyexhaustion of the rights conferred by a trademarkparallel import of medicinal products
spellingShingle Krzysztof Dobieżyński
Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
Studia Prawnicze KUL
free movement of goods
intellectual property
exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trademark
parallel import of medicinal products
title Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
title_full Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
title_fullStr Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
title_full_unstemmed Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
title_short Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 November 2022, C‑224/20
title_sort gloss to the judgment of the court of justice of 17 november 2022 c 224 20
topic free movement of goods
intellectual property
exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trademark
parallel import of medicinal products
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/sp/article/view/15132
work_keys_str_mv AT krzysztofdobiezynski glosstothejudgmentofthecourtofjusticeof17november2022c22420