Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate
Various micro-scale models for comparing alternative design concepts have been developed in recent decades. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of current user-friendly micro-climate models. In the results, a vast majority of models identified were excluded from the review because...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Atmosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1291 |
| _version_ | 1797515394478505984 |
|---|---|
| author | Britta Jänicke Dragan Milošević Suneja Manavvi |
| author_facet | Britta Jänicke Dragan Milošević Suneja Manavvi |
| author_sort | Britta Jänicke |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Various micro-scale models for comparing alternative design concepts have been developed in recent decades. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of current user-friendly micro-climate models. In the results, a vast majority of models identified were excluded from the review because the models were not micro-scale, lacking a user-interface, or were not available. In total, eight models met the seven-point inclusion criteria. These models were ADMS Temperature and Humidity model, advanced SkyHelios model, ANSYS FLUENT, ENVI-met, RayMan, SOLWEIG, TownScope, and UMEP. These models differ in their complexity and their widespread use in the scientific community, ranging from very few to thousands of citations. Most of these models simulate air temperature, global radiation, and mean radiant temperature, which helps to evaluate outdoor thermal comfort in cities. All of these models offer a linkage to CAD or GIS software and user support systems at various levels, which facilitates a smooth integration to planning and design. We detected that all models have been evaluated against observations. A wider model comparison, however, has only been performed for fewer models. With this review, we aim to support the finding of a reliable tool, which is fit for the specific purpose. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:44:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f484f66ef9b9434baec2068bdae1c78c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-4433 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:44:52Z |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-f484f66ef9b9434baec2068bdae1c78c2023-11-22T17:25:16ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-10-011210129110.3390/atmos12101291Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-ClimateBritta Jänicke0Dragan Milošević1Suneja Manavvi2Independent Researcher, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyClimatology and Hydrology Research Centre, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaDepartment of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, IndiaVarious micro-scale models for comparing alternative design concepts have been developed in recent decades. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of current user-friendly micro-climate models. In the results, a vast majority of models identified were excluded from the review because the models were not micro-scale, lacking a user-interface, or were not available. In total, eight models met the seven-point inclusion criteria. These models were ADMS Temperature and Humidity model, advanced SkyHelios model, ANSYS FLUENT, ENVI-met, RayMan, SOLWEIG, TownScope, and UMEP. These models differ in their complexity and their widespread use in the scientific community, ranging from very few to thousands of citations. Most of these models simulate air temperature, global radiation, and mean radiant temperature, which helps to evaluate outdoor thermal comfort in cities. All of these models offer a linkage to CAD or GIS software and user support systems at various levels, which facilitates a smooth integration to planning and design. We detected that all models have been evaluated against observations. A wider model comparison, however, has only been performed for fewer models. With this review, we aim to support the finding of a reliable tool, which is fit for the specific purpose.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1291urban climatemicro-climate modeloutdoor thermal comfortreview |
| spellingShingle | Britta Jänicke Dragan Milošević Suneja Manavvi Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate Atmosphere urban climate micro-climate model outdoor thermal comfort review |
| title | Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate |
| title_full | Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate |
| title_fullStr | Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate |
| title_full_unstemmed | Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate |
| title_short | Review of User-Friendly Models to Improve the Urban Micro-Climate |
| title_sort | review of user friendly models to improve the urban micro climate |
| topic | urban climate micro-climate model outdoor thermal comfort review |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1291 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brittajanicke reviewofuserfriendlymodelstoimprovetheurbanmicroclimate AT draganmilosevic reviewofuserfriendlymodelstoimprovetheurbanmicroclimate AT sunejamanavvi reviewofuserfriendlymodelstoimprovetheurbanmicroclimate |