The Case for the Vaccine Passport

In this critical commentary, we address the egalitarian critique according to which the use of a vaccine passport is unethical because it conflicts with the principle of equality, understood as requiring that citizens ought to be treated in the same way. We argue that this criticism is vulnerable to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jocelyn Maclure, Keven Bisson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal 2022-03-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/505
_version_ 1818774944214941696
author Jocelyn Maclure
Keven Bisson
author_facet Jocelyn Maclure
Keven Bisson
author_sort Jocelyn Maclure
collection DOAJ
description In this critical commentary, we address the egalitarian critique according to which the use of a vaccine passport is unethical because it conflicts with the principle of equality, understood as requiring that citizens ought to be treated in the same way. We argue that this criticism is vulnerable to the levelling-down objection often addressed to some egalitarian theories. We add that the vaccine passport is morally justified if two minimal ethical conditions are satisfied: 1) it must be designed as a temporary and transitory public health restriction, and 2) the disparities of treatment it introduces ought to infringe as little as possible upon fundamental rights and should not negate access to essential public services.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:49:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f486529fe3ad4eedb4e8d935a3f43ce5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-4665
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:49:11Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Bioethics
spelling doaj.art-f486529fe3ad4eedb4e8d935a3f43ce52022-12-21T21:10:29ZengProgrammes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalCanadian Journal of Bioethics2561-46652022-03-015110.7202/1087211arThe Case for the Vaccine PassportJocelyn Maclure0Keven Bisson1Department of Philosophy & Jarislowsky Chair in Human Nature and Technology, McGill University, Québec, CanadaDepartment of Philosophy, McGill University, Québec, CanadaIn this critical commentary, we address the egalitarian critique according to which the use of a vaccine passport is unethical because it conflicts with the principle of equality, understood as requiring that citizens ought to be treated in the same way. We argue that this criticism is vulnerable to the levelling-down objection often addressed to some egalitarian theories. We add that the vaccine passport is morally justified if two minimal ethical conditions are satisfied: 1) it must be designed as a temporary and transitory public health restriction, and 2) the disparities of treatment it introduces ought to infringe as little as possible upon fundamental rights and should not negate access to essential public services. https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/505vaccine passportimmunization proof,Covid-19equalityfairnesspublic health ethics
spellingShingle Jocelyn Maclure
Keven Bisson
The Case for the Vaccine Passport
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
vaccine passport
immunization proof,
Covid-19
equality
fairness
public health ethics
title The Case for the Vaccine Passport
title_full The Case for the Vaccine Passport
title_fullStr The Case for the Vaccine Passport
title_full_unstemmed The Case for the Vaccine Passport
title_short The Case for the Vaccine Passport
title_sort case for the vaccine passport
topic vaccine passport
immunization proof,
Covid-19
equality
fairness
public health ethics
url https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/505
work_keys_str_mv AT jocelynmaclure thecaseforthevaccinepassport
AT kevenbisson thecaseforthevaccinepassport
AT jocelynmaclure caseforthevaccinepassport
AT kevenbisson caseforthevaccinepassport