COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY
Prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is largely used in prostate cancer diagnostics. This procedure is usually quite painful and fear of pain could scare patients from this important research. The aim of the study was to compare methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy. The...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
2015-10-01
|
| Series: | Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/123 |
| _version_ | 1797877843558924288 |
|---|---|
| author | M. E. Topuzov A. E. Pryalukhin I. O. Belogortsev V. A. Zubarev S. S. Vodop’Yan |
| author_facet | M. E. Topuzov A. E. Pryalukhin I. O. Belogortsev V. A. Zubarev S. S. Vodop’Yan |
| author_sort | M. E. Topuzov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is largely used in prostate cancer diagnostics. This procedure is usually quite painful and fear of pain could scare patients from this important research. The aim of the study was to compare methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy. The patients were divided into 4 groups (40 patients in each group). TRUS-guided periprostatic anesthesia with 1% solution of lidocaine (10 ml) was carried out in the first group. An intrarectal introduction of 5 g EMLA cream (lidocaine 2,5% and prilocaine 2,5%) was applied in the second group. The intrarectal introduction of 10% lidocaine spray (3 doses) was used in the third group. Placebo as ultrasonic gel was utilized for the fourth group. The authors used the 100- score linear visual analog scale (LVS 1-100) and 5-score numeric visual scale (NVS-4). Minimal scores of pain were obtained in patients using TRUS-guided periprostatic anesthesia with 1% solution of lidocaine (10 ml). This type of anesthesia didn’t lead to increase of the number of complications. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T02:23:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f4888bd514324f2b88e1e1921b668d82 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0042-4625 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T02:23:21Z |
| publishDate | 2015-10-01 |
| publisher | Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова |
| spelling | doaj.art-f4888bd514324f2b88e1e1921b668d822023-03-13T08:09:09ZrusPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityВестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова0042-46252015-10-011745757810.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-5-75-78122COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSYM. E. Topuzov0A. E. Pryalukhin1I. O. Belogortsev2V. A. Zubarev3S. S. Vodop’Yan4I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityI. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityI. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityI. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityI. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityProstate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is largely used in prostate cancer diagnostics. This procedure is usually quite painful and fear of pain could scare patients from this important research. The aim of the study was to compare methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy. The patients were divided into 4 groups (40 patients in each group). TRUS-guided periprostatic anesthesia with 1% solution of lidocaine (10 ml) was carried out in the first group. An intrarectal introduction of 5 g EMLA cream (lidocaine 2,5% and prilocaine 2,5%) was applied in the second group. The intrarectal introduction of 10% lidocaine spray (3 doses) was used in the third group. Placebo as ultrasonic gel was utilized for the fourth group. The authors used the 100- score linear visual analog scale (LVS 1-100) and 5-score numeric visual scale (NVS-4). Minimal scores of pain were obtained in patients using TRUS-guided periprostatic anesthesia with 1% solution of lidocaine (10 ml). This type of anesthesia didn’t lead to increase of the number of complications.https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/123prostate biopsyprostate cancermethods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy |
| spellingShingle | M. E. Topuzov A. E. Pryalukhin I. O. Belogortsev V. A. Zubarev S. S. Vodop’Yan COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова prostate biopsy prostate cancer methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy |
| title | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY |
| title_full | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY |
| title_fullStr | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY |
| title_short | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CURRENT METHODS OF ANESTHESIA IN PERFORMANCE OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of current methods of anesthesia in performance of transrectal prostate biopsy |
| topic | prostate biopsy prostate cancer methods of anesthesia for prostate biopsy |
| url | https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/123 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT metopuzov comparativeevaluationofcurrentmethodsofanesthesiainperformanceoftransrectalprostatebiopsy AT aepryalukhin comparativeevaluationofcurrentmethodsofanesthesiainperformanceoftransrectalprostatebiopsy AT iobelogortsev comparativeevaluationofcurrentmethodsofanesthesiainperformanceoftransrectalprostatebiopsy AT vazubarev comparativeevaluationofcurrentmethodsofanesthesiainperformanceoftransrectalprostatebiopsy AT ssvodopyan comparativeevaluationofcurrentmethodsofanesthesiainperformanceoftransrectalprostatebiopsy |