CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5

Recent studies have found that terrestrial dryness indices like the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), and Aridity Index calculated from future climate model projections are mostly negative, implying a drying land surface with warming. Y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob Scheff , Justin S Mankin, Sloan Coats, Haibo Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fd
_version_ 1797747831716446208
author Jacob Scheff 
Justin S Mankin
Sloan Coats
Haibo Liu
author_facet Jacob Scheff 
Justin S Mankin
Sloan Coats
Haibo Liu
author_sort Jacob Scheff 
collection DOAJ
description Recent studies have found that terrestrial dryness indices like the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), and Aridity Index calculated from future climate model projections are mostly negative, implying a drying land surface with warming. Yet, the same models’ future runoff and bulk soil moisture projections instead show regional signals of varying sign, and their vegetation projections show widespread greening, suggesting that the dryness indices could overstate climate change’s direct impacts. Most modeling studies have attributed this gap to the indices’ omission of CO _2 -driven stomatal closure. However, here we show that the index-impact gap is still wide even in future-like model experiments that switch off CO _2 effects on plants. In these simulations, mean PDSI, Aridity Index, and SPEI still decline broadly with strong warming, while mean runoff, bulk soil moisture, and vegetation still respond more equivocally. This implies that CO _2 -plant effects are not the dominant or sole reason for the simulated index-impact gap. We discuss several alternative mechanisms that may explain it.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:57:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f48dff3b11614121b59bbb1754a5f4de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:57:13Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-f48dff3b11614121b59bbb1754a5f4de2023-08-09T14:53:31ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262021-01-0116303401810.1088/1748-9326/abd8fdCO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5Jacob Scheff 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-3447Justin S Mankin1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-4555Sloan Coats2Haibo Liu3Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina Charlotte , Charlotte, NC, United States of AmericaDepartment of Geography and Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College , Hanover, NH, United States of America; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory , Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States of AmericaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa , Honolulu, HI, United States of AmericaLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory , Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States of AmericaRecent studies have found that terrestrial dryness indices like the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), and Aridity Index calculated from future climate model projections are mostly negative, implying a drying land surface with warming. Yet, the same models’ future runoff and bulk soil moisture projections instead show regional signals of varying sign, and their vegetation projections show widespread greening, suggesting that the dryness indices could overstate climate change’s direct impacts. Most modeling studies have attributed this gap to the indices’ omission of CO _2 -driven stomatal closure. However, here we show that the index-impact gap is still wide even in future-like model experiments that switch off CO _2 effects on plants. In these simulations, mean PDSI, Aridity Index, and SPEI still decline broadly with strong warming, while mean runoff, bulk soil moisture, and vegetation still respond more equivocally. This implies that CO _2 -plant effects are not the dominant or sole reason for the simulated index-impact gap. We discuss several alternative mechanisms that may explain it.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fdclimate changedroughtaridityCO2-plant effectsEarth system modelsfuture projections
spellingShingle Jacob Scheff 
Justin S Mankin
Sloan Coats
Haibo Liu
CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
Environmental Research Letters
climate change
drought
aridity
CO2-plant effects
Earth system models
future projections
title CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
title_full CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
title_fullStr CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
title_full_unstemmed CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
title_short CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5
title_sort co2 plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in cmip6 or cmip5
topic climate change
drought
aridity
CO2-plant effects
Earth system models
future projections
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fd
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobscheff co2planteffectsdonotaccountforthegapbetweendrynessindicesandprojecteddrynessimpactsincmip6orcmip5
AT justinsmankin co2planteffectsdonotaccountforthegapbetweendrynessindicesandprojecteddrynessimpactsincmip6orcmip5
AT sloancoats co2planteffectsdonotaccountforthegapbetweendrynessindicesandprojecteddrynessimpactsincmip6orcmip5
AT haiboliu co2planteffectsdonotaccountforthegapbetweendrynessindicesandprojecteddrynessimpactsincmip6orcmip5