Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence

Abstract Background Childhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Fritz, J. Stochl, E. I. Fried, I. M. Goodyer, C. D. van Borkulo, P. O. Wilkinson, A.-L. van Harmelen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-019-1430-6
_version_ 1818936386446688256
author J. Fritz
J. Stochl
E. I. Fried
I. M. Goodyer
C. D. van Borkulo
P. O. Wilkinson
A.-L. van Harmelen
author_facet J. Fritz
J. Stochl
E. I. Fried
I. M. Goodyer
C. D. van Borkulo
P. O. Wilkinson
A.-L. van Harmelen
author_sort J. Fritz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Childhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and their changes between early (age 14) and later adolescence (age 17). Methods We studied 10 empirically supported RFs in adolescents with (CA+; n = 631) and without CA (CA−; n = 499), using network psychometrics. Results All inter-personal RFs (e.g. friendships) showed stable mean levels between age 14 and 17, and three of seven intra-personal RFs (e.g. distress tolerance) changed in a similar manner in the two groups. The CA+ group had lower RFs and higher distress at both ages. Thus, CA does not seem to inhibit RF changes, but to increase the risk of persistently lower RFs. At age 14, but not 17, the RF network of the CA+ group was less positively connected, suggesting that RFs are less likely to enhance each other than in the CA− group. Those findings underpin the notion that CA has a predominantly strong proximal effect. RF-distress pathways did not differ in strength between the CA+ and the CA− group, which suggests that RFs have a similarly protective strength in the two groups. Yet, as RFs are lower and distress is higher, RF-distress pathways may overall be less advantageous in the CA+ group. Most RF interrelations and RF-distress pathways were stable between age 14 and 17, which may help explain why exposure to CA is frequently found to have a lasting impact on mental health. Conclusions Our findings not only shed light on the nature and changes of RFs between early and later adolescence, but also offer some accounts for why exposure to CA has stronger proximal effects and is often found to have a lasting impact on mental health.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:35:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4a83772363a4845a28cab77456265a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1741-7015
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:35:14Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f4a83772363a4845a28cab77456265a52022-12-21T19:51:39ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152019-11-0117111610.1186/s12916-019-1430-6Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescenceJ. Fritz0J. Stochl1E. I. Fried2I. M. Goodyer3C. D. van Borkulo4P. O. Wilkinson5A.-L. van Harmelen6Department of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeAbstract Background Childhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and their changes between early (age 14) and later adolescence (age 17). Methods We studied 10 empirically supported RFs in adolescents with (CA+; n = 631) and without CA (CA−; n = 499), using network psychometrics. Results All inter-personal RFs (e.g. friendships) showed stable mean levels between age 14 and 17, and three of seven intra-personal RFs (e.g. distress tolerance) changed in a similar manner in the two groups. The CA+ group had lower RFs and higher distress at both ages. Thus, CA does not seem to inhibit RF changes, but to increase the risk of persistently lower RFs. At age 14, but not 17, the RF network of the CA+ group was less positively connected, suggesting that RFs are less likely to enhance each other than in the CA− group. Those findings underpin the notion that CA has a predominantly strong proximal effect. RF-distress pathways did not differ in strength between the CA+ and the CA− group, which suggests that RFs have a similarly protective strength in the two groups. Yet, as RFs are lower and distress is higher, RF-distress pathways may overall be less advantageous in the CA+ group. Most RF interrelations and RF-distress pathways were stable between age 14 and 17, which may help explain why exposure to CA is frequently found to have a lasting impact on mental health. Conclusions Our findings not only shed light on the nature and changes of RFs between early and later adolescence, but also offer some accounts for why exposure to CA has stronger proximal effects and is often found to have a lasting impact on mental health.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-019-1430-6Resilience factorsChildhood adversityMental healthAdolescence
spellingShingle J. Fritz
J. Stochl
E. I. Fried
I. M. Goodyer
C. D. van Borkulo
P. O. Wilkinson
A.-L. van Harmelen
Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
BMC Medicine
Resilience factors
Childhood adversity
Mental health
Adolescence
title Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
title_full Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
title_fullStr Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
title_full_unstemmed Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
title_short Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
title_sort unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence
topic Resilience factors
Childhood adversity
Mental health
Adolescence
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-019-1430-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jfritz unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT jstochl unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT eifried unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT imgoodyer unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT cdvanborkulo unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT powilkinson unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence
AT alvanharmelen unravellingthecomplexnatureofresiliencefactorsandtheirchangesbetweenearlyandlateradolescence