Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion

Introduction: Recent investigations focused on the optimization of atraumatic cochlear implant surgery have highlighted the relevance of the electrode array (EA) insertion trajectory. This is particularly studied in the context of minimally-invasive “keyhole” and robotic-assisted approaches, e.g. to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zuniga M. Geraldine, Böttcher Georg, Schell Viktor, Lenarz Thomas, Rau Thomas S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-10-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2029
_version_ 1811290870623764480
author Zuniga M. Geraldine
Böttcher Georg
Schell Viktor
Lenarz Thomas
Rau Thomas S.
author_facet Zuniga M. Geraldine
Böttcher Georg
Schell Viktor
Lenarz Thomas
Rau Thomas S.
author_sort Zuniga M. Geraldine
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Recent investigations focused on the optimization of atraumatic cochlear implant surgery have highlighted the relevance of the electrode array (EA) insertion trajectory. This is particularly studied in the context of minimally-invasive “keyhole” and robotic-assisted approaches, e.g. to avoid injuring structures inside and outside the cochlea. However, little is known about the natural, manual movements and trajectory followed during the insertion process. The present work illustrates the orientation changes within the trajectory a surgeon follows during insertions of EAs into a human cadaveric cochlea. Methods: An EA insertion tool equipped with a gyroscope was developed in our laboratory. During the insertion trials, the gyroscope captures the tool’s spatial orientation. A human head specimen and a single EA were used to perform insertions into a cochlea. A cochlear implant surgeon performed all insertion trials. The recorded orientations were compared to the initial orientation upon cochlea entry to assess the surgeon’s range of motion by calculating the angle between orientation vectors. Results: Fifteen EA insertions were performed with a median maximal deviation from the initial orientation of 7.2° (5.3 -11.1°) across trials. The largest orientation changes were seen towards the last half of each insertion trial. A negative relationship between degree of axis change and number of insertion trial was observed (r = -0.5). Conclusion: Manual EA insertions into a cadaveric cochlea revealed an insertion trajectory with maximum orientation changes of approximately < 10° degrees. The observed trend on decreasing range of motion with increasing number of insertion trials may be attributed to surgeon’s familiarization with the insertion trajectory for this specific specimen but other contributing factors (e.g. EA softening) need to be further elucidated with several EAs. Future evaluations can help determine if this orientation change is influenced by surgeon expertise.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:19:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4ac5e0750ca4424bcec5f2f29609819
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-5504
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:19:57Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-f4ac5e0750ca4424bcec5f2f296098192022-12-22T03:02:50ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042021-10-017211311610.1515/cdbme-2021-2029Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertionZuniga M. Geraldine0Böttcher Georg1Schell Viktor2Lenarz Thomas3Rau Thomas S.4Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 “Hearing4all”, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 “Hearing4all”, Hannover Medical School,Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 “Hearing4all”, Hannover Medical School,Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 “Hearing4all”, Hannover Medical School,Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 “Hearing4all”, Hannover Medical School,Hannover, GermanyIntroduction: Recent investigations focused on the optimization of atraumatic cochlear implant surgery have highlighted the relevance of the electrode array (EA) insertion trajectory. This is particularly studied in the context of minimally-invasive “keyhole” and robotic-assisted approaches, e.g. to avoid injuring structures inside and outside the cochlea. However, little is known about the natural, manual movements and trajectory followed during the insertion process. The present work illustrates the orientation changes within the trajectory a surgeon follows during insertions of EAs into a human cadaveric cochlea. Methods: An EA insertion tool equipped with a gyroscope was developed in our laboratory. During the insertion trials, the gyroscope captures the tool’s spatial orientation. A human head specimen and a single EA were used to perform insertions into a cochlea. A cochlear implant surgeon performed all insertion trials. The recorded orientations were compared to the initial orientation upon cochlea entry to assess the surgeon’s range of motion by calculating the angle between orientation vectors. Results: Fifteen EA insertions were performed with a median maximal deviation from the initial orientation of 7.2° (5.3 -11.1°) across trials. The largest orientation changes were seen towards the last half of each insertion trial. A negative relationship between degree of axis change and number of insertion trial was observed (r = -0.5). Conclusion: Manual EA insertions into a cadaveric cochlea revealed an insertion trajectory with maximum orientation changes of approximately < 10° degrees. The observed trend on decreasing range of motion with increasing number of insertion trials may be attributed to surgeon’s familiarization with the insertion trajectory for this specific specimen but other contributing factors (e.g. EA softening) need to be further elucidated with several EAs. Future evaluations can help determine if this orientation change is influenced by surgeon expertise.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2029cochlear implantautomatedsoft surgery
spellingShingle Zuniga M. Geraldine
Böttcher Georg
Schell Viktor
Lenarz Thomas
Rau Thomas S.
Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
cochlear implant
automated
soft surgery
title Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
title_full Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
title_fullStr Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
title_full_unstemmed Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
title_short Illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
title_sort illustrating orientation changes of the insertion trajectory during cochlear implant electrode array insertion
topic cochlear implant
automated
soft surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2029
work_keys_str_mv AT zunigamgeraldine illustratingorientationchangesoftheinsertiontrajectoryduringcochlearimplantelectrodearrayinsertion
AT bottchergeorg illustratingorientationchangesoftheinsertiontrajectoryduringcochlearimplantelectrodearrayinsertion
AT schellviktor illustratingorientationchangesoftheinsertiontrajectoryduringcochlearimplantelectrodearrayinsertion
AT lenarzthomas illustratingorientationchangesoftheinsertiontrajectoryduringcochlearimplantelectrodearrayinsertion
AT rauthomass illustratingorientationchangesoftheinsertiontrajectoryduringcochlearimplantelectrodearrayinsertion