Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia

This paper utilizes an analytical distinction between three modes of social belonging to explain the ambiguous resettlement experiences of refugees granted a temporary protection visa (TPV) in Australia. Findings from two qualitative studies indicate that the dominance of a public discourse that dep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Humpage, Greg Marston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: York University Libraries 2005-09-01
Series:Refuge
Online Access:https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21332
_version_ 1818275528181809152
author Louise Humpage
Greg Marston
author_facet Louise Humpage
Greg Marston
author_sort Louise Humpage
collection DOAJ
description This paper utilizes an analytical distinction between three modes of social belonging to explain the ambiguous resettlement experiences of refugees granted a temporary protection visa (TPV) in Australia. Findings from two qualitative studies indicate that the dominance of a public discourse that depicts asylum seekers as “illegals” inhibits their sense of belonging at the national level. Yet belonging has been facilitated locally through relational networks within communities and the establishment of associations based on cultural or legal categories. Importantly, these successes have provided a basis from which to contest the continued lack of recognition faced by TPV refugees within a nationalistic public discourse.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:31:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4ada66809614999802d1ce1c452fb82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0229-5113
1920-7336
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:31:11Z
publishDate 2005-09-01
publisher York University Libraries
record_format Article
series Refuge
spelling doaj.art-f4ada66809614999802d1ce1c452fb822022-12-22T00:09:36ZengYork University LibrariesRefuge0229-51131920-73362005-09-0122210.25071/1920-7336.21332Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in AustraliaLouise HumpageGreg MarstonThis paper utilizes an analytical distinction between three modes of social belonging to explain the ambiguous resettlement experiences of refugees granted a temporary protection visa (TPV) in Australia. Findings from two qualitative studies indicate that the dominance of a public discourse that depicts asylum seekers as “illegals” inhibits their sense of belonging at the national level. Yet belonging has been facilitated locally through relational networks within communities and the establishment of associations based on cultural or legal categories. Importantly, these successes have provided a basis from which to contest the continued lack of recognition faced by TPV refugees within a nationalistic public discourse.https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21332
spellingShingle Louise Humpage
Greg Marston
Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
Refuge
title Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
title_full Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
title_fullStr Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
title_short Contested Belonging: Temporary Protection in Australia
title_sort contested belonging temporary protection in australia
url https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21332
work_keys_str_mv AT louisehumpage contestedbelongingtemporaryprotectioninaustralia
AT gregmarston contestedbelongingtemporaryprotectioninaustralia