How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review
A commonly cited use of Learning Styles theory is to use information from self-report questionnaires to assign learners into one or more of a handful of supposed styles (e.g., Visual, Auditory, Converger) and then design teaching materials that match the supposed styles of individual students. A num...
Main Authors: | Philip M. Newton, Atharva Salvi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451/full |
Similar Items
-
The Learning Styles Neuromyth Is Still Thriving in Medical Education
by: Philip M. Newton, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
The Learning Styles myth is thriving in higher education
by: Phil eNewton
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths
by: Kelly Macdonald, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Learning styles, academic performance and teaching evaluation
by: Suzete Antonieta Lizote, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Preferred Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents: An Iranian Sample
by: Samira Hassanzadeh, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)