Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects

Abstract Is pro sociality a natural impulse or the result of a self-controlled behavior? We investigate this issue in a lab in the field experiment with participants from the general adult population in Italy. We find two key results: first, that there is a positive relationship between pro socialit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesca Pancotto, Simone Righi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91960-3
_version_ 1818461332595277824
author Francesca Pancotto
Simone Righi
author_facet Francesca Pancotto
Simone Righi
author_sort Francesca Pancotto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Is pro sociality a natural impulse or the result of a self-controlled behavior? We investigate this issue in a lab in the field experiment with participants from the general adult population in Italy. We find two key results: first, that there is a positive relationship between pro sociality and strategic reasoning. Second, that reflectivity relates to lower pro sociality but only among strategic subjects, indicating that the intuitive view of pro sociality is valid only among strategic individuals. Non-strategic individuals are instead intuitively selfish. We surmise that these results emerge due to a common cognitive root between strategizing and pro sociality, namely empathy.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:44:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4c375bc575d41c49f0ed0f3ef52b024
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:44:28Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f4c375bc575d41c49f0ed0f3ef52b0242022-12-21T22:43:27ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111510.1038/s41598-021-91960-3Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjectsFrancesca Pancotto0Simone Righi1University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaUniversity Ca’Foscari of VeniceAbstract Is pro sociality a natural impulse or the result of a self-controlled behavior? We investigate this issue in a lab in the field experiment with participants from the general adult population in Italy. We find two key results: first, that there is a positive relationship between pro sociality and strategic reasoning. Second, that reflectivity relates to lower pro sociality but only among strategic subjects, indicating that the intuitive view of pro sociality is valid only among strategic individuals. Non-strategic individuals are instead intuitively selfish. We surmise that these results emerge due to a common cognitive root between strategizing and pro sociality, namely empathy.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91960-3
spellingShingle Francesca Pancotto
Simone Righi
Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
Scientific Reports
title Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
title_full Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
title_fullStr Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
title_full_unstemmed Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
title_short Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects
title_sort reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naive and strategic subjects
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91960-3
work_keys_str_mv AT francescapancotto reflectivityrelatesdifferentlytoprosocialityinnaiveandstrategicsubjects
AT simonerighi reflectivityrelatesdifferentlytoprosocialityinnaiveandstrategicsubjects