MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA?
This paper reviews the extent to which the development of instruments that implement the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters, particularly the European arrest warrant (EAW), may be considered valuable tools for effectively combating cross-border crime in the Eur...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Danubius University
2006-05-01
|
| Series: | EIRP Proceedings |
| Online Access: | http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1164/1080 |
| _version_ | 1811276245997977600 |
|---|---|
| author | Florentina Pusca |
| author_facet | Florentina Pusca |
| author_sort | Florentina Pusca |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper reviews the extent to which the development of instruments that implement the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters, particularly the European arrest warrant (EAW), may be considered valuable tools for effectively combating cross-border crime in the European Union. In addition, we assess how these policy orientations may or may not overcome the persistent mistrust and lack of confidence among the member states, while at the same time respecting human rights and civil liberties. In particular, this paper analyses: 1. EU judicial cooperation in criminal matters: does it fight and prevent cross-border crime effectively in the EU? 2. The European arrest warrant – is it an improved method to replace extradition? Does the EAW provide a better solution to the practical complexities and difficulties that characterise the current extradition system? What are the inherent gaps in the proposed new surrender procedure under the EAW? 3. Does the EAW guarantee a good balance between efficiency and judicial protection of the individual’s fundamental rights? Does the Green Paper on procedural safeguards for suspect sand defendants in criminal proceedings throughout the EU provide the right way forward? Does the EAW involve a real risk to the legal position and human rights of suspected individuals? 4. What is the added value of EU judicial cooperation against cross-border crime? |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:53:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f4c96b3dd39f45309b83ba8e1b0550c0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2067-9211 2069-9344 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:53:03Z |
| publishDate | 2006-05-01 |
| publisher | Danubius University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EIRP Proceedings |
| spelling | doaj.art-f4c96b3dd39f45309b83ba8e1b0550c02022-12-22T03:11:37ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442006-05-0111246254MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA?Florentina PuscaThis paper reviews the extent to which the development of instruments that implement the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters, particularly the European arrest warrant (EAW), may be considered valuable tools for effectively combating cross-border crime in the European Union. In addition, we assess how these policy orientations may or may not overcome the persistent mistrust and lack of confidence among the member states, while at the same time respecting human rights and civil liberties. In particular, this paper analyses: 1. EU judicial cooperation in criminal matters: does it fight and prevent cross-border crime effectively in the EU? 2. The European arrest warrant – is it an improved method to replace extradition? Does the EAW provide a better solution to the practical complexities and difficulties that characterise the current extradition system? What are the inherent gaps in the proposed new surrender procedure under the EAW? 3. Does the EAW guarantee a good balance between efficiency and judicial protection of the individual’s fundamental rights? Does the Green Paper on procedural safeguards for suspect sand defendants in criminal proceedings throughout the EU provide the right way forward? Does the EAW involve a real risk to the legal position and human rights of suspected individuals? 4. What is the added value of EU judicial cooperation against cross-border crime?http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1164/1080 |
| spellingShingle | Florentina Pusca MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? EIRP Proceedings |
| title | MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? |
| title_full | MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? |
| title_fullStr | MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? |
| title_full_unstemmed | MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? |
| title_short | MANDATUL EUROPEAN DE ARESTARE – O METODĂ ÎMBUNĂTĂŢITĂ CARE ÎNLOCUIEŞTE EXTRĂDAREA? |
| title_sort | mandatul european de arestare o metoda imbunatatita care inlocuieste extradarea |
| url | http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1164/1080 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT florentinapusca mandatuleuropeandearestareometodaimbunatatitacareinlocuiesteextradarea |