Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models

<p>Based on the assessment from 230 flux site observations, intra-day and daytime ground heat flux (<span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span>) accounted for 19.2 % and 28.8 % of the corresponding net radiation, respectively. This indicates that <span cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Z. Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-12-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/6207/2022/hess-26-6207-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811202740875952128
author Z. Liu
Z. Liu
author_facet Z. Liu
Z. Liu
author_sort Z. Liu
collection DOAJ
description <p>Based on the assessment from 230 flux site observations, intra-day and daytime ground heat flux (<span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span>) accounted for 19.2 % and 28.8 % of the corresponding net radiation, respectively. This indicates that <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> plays an important role in remote-sensing (RS) energy-balance-based evapotranspiration (ET) models. The <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> empirical estimation methods have been evaluated at many individual sites, while there have been relatively few multi-site evaluation studies. The accuracy of the five empirical <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based RS–ET models was evaluated using half-hourly observations. The linear coefficient (LC) method and the two methods embedded with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were able to accurately simulate a half-hourly <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> series at most sites. The mean and median Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of all sites were generally higher than 0.50 in each half-hour period. The accuracy of each method varied significantly at different sites and at half-hour intervals. The highest accuracy was exhibited during 06:00–07:00 LST (all times hereafter are LST), followed by the period of 17:00–18:00. There were 92 % (<span class="inline-formula">211</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) sites with an NSE of the LC method greater than 0.50 at 06:30. It showed a slightly higher accuracy during nighttime periods than during daytime periods. The lowest accuracy was observed during the period of 10:00–15:30. The sites with an NSE exceeding 0.50 only accounted for 51 % (<span class="inline-formula">118</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) and 43 % (<span class="inline-formula">100</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) at 10:30 and 13:30, respectively. The accuracy of the model was generally higher in Northern Hemisphere sites than in Southern Hemisphere sites. In general, the highest and lowest accuracies were observed at the high- and low-latitude sites, respectively. The performance of the LC method and the methods embedded with NDVI were generally satisfactory at the Eurasian and North American sites, with the NSE values of most sites exceeding 0.70. Conversely, it exhibited relatively poor performance at the African, South American, and Oceanian sites, especially the African sites. Both the temporal and spatial distributions of the accuracy of the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation were positively correlated with the correlation between <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> and the net radiation. Although the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation methods accurately simulated the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> series at most sites and time periods, their performance was poor at some sites and time periods. The application of RS ET datasets covering these sites requires caution. Further improvement of <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulations at these sites and time periods is recommended for the RS ET modelers. In addition, variable parameters are recommended in empirical methods of <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation to improve accuracy. Instead of the  <span class="inline-formula"><i>R</i><sub>n</sub></span>, finding another variable that has a physical connection and strong correlation with <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> might be a more efficient solution for the improvement, since the weak correlation between <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>R</i><sub>n</sub></span> is the main reason for the poor performance at these regions.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:43:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4cce6745bd94ab58d4446ab9683d1dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:43:44Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f4cce6745bd94ab58d4446ab9683d1dd2022-12-22T03:51:15ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382022-12-01266207622610.5194/hess-26-6207-2022Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration modelsZ. Liu0Z. Liu1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China<p>Based on the assessment from 230 flux site observations, intra-day and daytime ground heat flux (<span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span>) accounted for 19.2 % and 28.8 % of the corresponding net radiation, respectively. This indicates that <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> plays an important role in remote-sensing (RS) energy-balance-based evapotranspiration (ET) models. The <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> empirical estimation methods have been evaluated at many individual sites, while there have been relatively few multi-site evaluation studies. The accuracy of the five empirical <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based RS–ET models was evaluated using half-hourly observations. The linear coefficient (LC) method and the two methods embedded with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were able to accurately simulate a half-hourly <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> series at most sites. The mean and median Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of all sites were generally higher than 0.50 in each half-hour period. The accuracy of each method varied significantly at different sites and at half-hour intervals. The highest accuracy was exhibited during 06:00–07:00 LST (all times hereafter are LST), followed by the period of 17:00–18:00. There were 92 % (<span class="inline-formula">211</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) sites with an NSE of the LC method greater than 0.50 at 06:30. It showed a slightly higher accuracy during nighttime periods than during daytime periods. The lowest accuracy was observed during the period of 10:00–15:30. The sites with an NSE exceeding 0.50 only accounted for 51 % (<span class="inline-formula">118</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) and 43 % (<span class="inline-formula">100</span>/<span class="inline-formula">230</span>) at 10:30 and 13:30, respectively. The accuracy of the model was generally higher in Northern Hemisphere sites than in Southern Hemisphere sites. In general, the highest and lowest accuracies were observed at the high- and low-latitude sites, respectively. The performance of the LC method and the methods embedded with NDVI were generally satisfactory at the Eurasian and North American sites, with the NSE values of most sites exceeding 0.70. Conversely, it exhibited relatively poor performance at the African, South American, and Oceanian sites, especially the African sites. Both the temporal and spatial distributions of the accuracy of the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation were positively correlated with the correlation between <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> and the net radiation. Although the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation methods accurately simulated the <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> series at most sites and time periods, their performance was poor at some sites and time periods. The application of RS ET datasets covering these sites requires caution. Further improvement of <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulations at these sites and time periods is recommended for the RS ET modelers. In addition, variable parameters are recommended in empirical methods of <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> simulation to improve accuracy. Instead of the  <span class="inline-formula"><i>R</i><sub>n</sub></span>, finding another variable that has a physical connection and strong correlation with <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> might be a more efficient solution for the improvement, since the weak correlation between <span class="inline-formula"><i>G</i></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>R</i><sub>n</sub></span> is the main reason for the poor performance at these regions.</p>https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/6207/2022/hess-26-6207-2022.pdf
spellingShingle Z. Liu
Z. Liu
Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
title_full Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
title_fullStr Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
title_short Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
title_sort accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface energy balance based remote sensing evapotranspiration models
url https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/6207/2022/hess-26-6207-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zliu accuracyoffivegroundheatfluxempiricalsimulationmethodsinthesurfaceenergybalancebasedremotesensingevapotranspirationmodels
AT zliu accuracyoffivegroundheatfluxempiricalsimulationmethodsinthesurfaceenergybalancebasedremotesensingevapotranspirationmodels