Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae

Lingula is often considered a "living-fossil" based on its supposed lengthy morphological conservatism owing to its absence of evolution, and its remarkable survival for more than 550 M.Y. This conclusion is based on the typical apparently unchanged "linguliform" shape of the she...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emig Christian C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Carnets de Geologie 2003-05-01
Series:Carnets de Géologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/CG2003_L01_CCE/index.html
_version_ 1827839403053023232
author Emig Christian C.
author_facet Emig Christian C.
author_sort Emig Christian C.
collection DOAJ
description Lingula is often considered a "living-fossil" based on its supposed lengthy morphological conservatism owing to its absence of evolution, and its remarkable survival for more than 550 M.Y. This conclusion is based on the typical apparently unchanged "linguliform" shape of the shell. However the taxa of the family Lingulidae show morphological evolutionary changes despite the fact that the group appears panchronic among the Recent Brachiopoda. Consequently, traditional opinion that Lingula is a "living-fossil" should be rejected. Diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae and of its three genera are herewith emended.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:20:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4d52885abd843c7a3fb952165093d64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1765-2553
1634-0744
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:20:46Z
publishDate 2003-05-01
publisher Association Carnets de Geologie
record_format Article
series Carnets de Géologie
spelling doaj.art-f4d52885abd843c7a3fb952165093d642023-09-02T22:32:15ZengAssociation Carnets de GeologieCarnets de Géologie1765-25531634-07442003-05-01CG2003L0118Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family LingulidaeEmig Christian C.Lingula is often considered a "living-fossil" based on its supposed lengthy morphological conservatism owing to its absence of evolution, and its remarkable survival for more than 550 M.Y. This conclusion is based on the typical apparently unchanged "linguliform" shape of the shell. However the taxa of the family Lingulidae show morphological evolutionary changes despite the fact that the group appears panchronic among the Recent Brachiopoda. Consequently, traditional opinion that Lingula is a "living-fossil" should be rejected. Diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae and of its three genera are herewith emended.http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/CG2003_L01_CCE/index.htmlliving-fossilLingulaLingulidaeBrachiopodataxonomy
spellingShingle Emig Christian C.
Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
Carnets de Géologie
living-fossil
Lingula
Lingulidae
Brachiopoda
taxonomy
title Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
title_full Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
title_fullStr Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
title_full_unstemmed Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
title_short Proof that Lingula (Brachiopoda) is not a living-fossil, and emended diagnoses of the Family Lingulidae
title_sort proof that lingula brachiopoda is not a living fossil and emended diagnoses of the family lingulidae
topic living-fossil
Lingula
Lingulidae
Brachiopoda
taxonomy
url http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/CG2003_L01_CCE/index.html
work_keys_str_mv AT emigchristianc proofthatlingulabrachiopodaisnotalivingfossilandemendeddiagnosesofthefamilylingulidae