Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Borntraeger
1996-07-01
|
| Series: | Meteorologische Zeitschrift |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130 |
| Summary: | The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by G. J. W Visscher (1995). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0941-2948 |