Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Borntraeger
1996-07-01
|
Series: | Meteorologische Zeitschrift |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130 |
_version_ | 1797320864826392576 |
---|---|
author | Dietrich Sonntag |
author_facet | Dietrich Sonntag |
author_sort | Dietrich Sonntag |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by G. J. W Visscher (1995). |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:49:11Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f4e5d0746ef64afb9ebbd96d11f242da |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0941-2948 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:49:11Z |
publishDate | 1996-07-01 |
publisher | Borntraeger |
record_format | Article |
series | Meteorologische Zeitschrift |
spelling | doaj.art-f4e5d0746ef64afb9ebbd96d11f242da2024-02-08T08:15:00ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29481996-07-015313013110.1127/metz/5/1996/13089524Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?Dietrich SonntagThe above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by G. J. W Visscher (1995).http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130psychrometercoefficient |
spellingShingle | Dietrich Sonntag Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? Meteorologische Zeitschrift psychrometer coefficient |
title | Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? |
title_full | Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? |
title_fullStr | Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? |
title_short | Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed? |
title_sort | reply to a comment by k schurer and g j w visscher a lower psychrometer coefficient still confirmed |
topic | psychrometer coefficient |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietrichsonntag replytoacommentbykschurerandgjwvisscheralowerpsychrometercoefficientstillconfirmed |