Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?

The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dietrich Sonntag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borntraeger 1996-07-01
Series:Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130
_version_ 1797320864826392576
author Dietrich Sonntag
author_facet Dietrich Sonntag
author_sort Dietrich Sonntag
collection DOAJ
description The above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by G. J. W Visscher (1995).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:49:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4e5d0746ef64afb9ebbd96d11f242da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0941-2948
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:49:11Z
publishDate 1996-07-01
publisher Borntraeger
record_format Article
series Meteorologische Zeitschrift
spelling doaj.art-f4e5d0746ef64afb9ebbd96d11f242da2024-02-08T08:15:00ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29481996-07-015313013110.1127/metz/5/1996/13089524Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?Dietrich SonntagThe above question has to be answered that a lower psychrometer coefficient is not confirmed. In the following, this fact will be discussed in detail. As the above paper is very concise, and since many details are missing, the author had to refer to the comprehensive program of IMAG-DLO published by G. J. W Visscher (1995).http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130psychrometercoefficient
spellingShingle Dietrich Sonntag
Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
psychrometer
coefficient
title Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
title_full Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
title_fullStr Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
title_full_unstemmed Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
title_short Reply to a comment by K. Schurer and G. J. W. Visscher: A lower psychrometer coefficient — still confirmed?
title_sort reply to a comment by k schurer and g j w visscher a lower psychrometer coefficient still confirmed
topic psychrometer
coefficient
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/130
work_keys_str_mv AT dietrichsonntag replytoacommentbykschurerandgjwvisscheralowerpsychrometercoefficientstillconfirmed