Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a better method for diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding than traditional methods – An Indian perspective
Introduction: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the common problems affecting at least one fourth women in reproductive age group. Currently transabdominal and transvaginal sonography is the most commonly used primary screening modality, whereas uterine dilatation and curettage (D&C) is...
Main Authors: | Biswas D, Kanniga R, Ratnani R, Ray R |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KIMS Foundation and Research Center
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical and Scientific Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmsronline.com/archive-article/Diagnostic-hysteroscopy-better-method-diagnosis |
Similar Items
-
Diagnostic hysteroscopy versus diagnostic curettage for evaluation of endometrial pathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
by: Maad S. Al Adami, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation
by: Prashant Bhingare, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Comparison of hysteroscopy and histopathology in diagnosing abnormal uterine bleeding: an experience from a tertiary care center of eastern India
by: Subrata Das, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Dilatação e Curetagem na Avaliação do Sangramento Uterino Anormal: Achados Histopatológicos e Relação Custo/Benefício Dilatation and Curettage in the Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Histopathologic Findings and the Cost/Benefit Relation
by: Luiz Augusto Henrique Melki, et al.
Published: (2000-09-01) -
Diagnostic values of pipelle and standard curettage compared to hysterectomy pathology in postmenopausal bleeding: A comparative study
by: Fariba Behnamfar, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)