Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction

The long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abraded and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JAMES H. LEVER, SUSAN TAYLOR, GARRETT R. HOCH, CHARLES DAGHLIAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000977/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155833773359104
author JAMES H. LEVER
SUSAN TAYLOR
GARRETT R. HOCH
CHARLES DAGHLIAN
author_facet JAMES H. LEVER
SUSAN TAYLOR
GARRETT R. HOCH
CHARLES DAGHLIAN
author_sort JAMES H. LEVER
collection DOAJ
description The long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abraded and did not melt under a polyethylene slider, despite low friction values. Here we provide additional observational and theoretical evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction. We obtained coordinated infrared, visible-light and scanning-electron micrographs that confirm that the evolving shapes observed during our tribometer tests are contacting snow grains polished by abrasion, and that the wear particles can sinter together and fill the adjacent pore spaces. Furthermore, dry-contact abrasive wear reasonably predicts the evolution of snow-slider contact area, and sliding-heat-source theory confirms that contact temperatures would not reach 0°C during our tribometer tests. Importantly, published measurements of interface temperatures also indicate that melting did not occur during field tests on sleds and skis. Although prevailing theory anticipates a transition from dry to lubricated contact along a slider, we suggest that dry-contact abrasion and heat flow can prevent this transition from occurring for snow-friction scenarios of practical interest.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4ead8268c944c3597f2522e94e87fd8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:41:19Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-f4ead8268c944c3597f2522e94e87fd82023-03-09T12:40:42ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522019-02-0165688410.1017/jog.2018.97Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic frictionJAMES H. LEVER0SUSAN TAYLOR1GARRETT R. HOCH2CHARLES DAGHLIAN3Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH 03755, USACold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH 03755, USACold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH 03755, USADartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USAThe long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abraded and did not melt under a polyethylene slider, despite low friction values. Here we provide additional observational and theoretical evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction. We obtained coordinated infrared, visible-light and scanning-electron micrographs that confirm that the evolving shapes observed during our tribometer tests are contacting snow grains polished by abrasion, and that the wear particles can sinter together and fill the adjacent pore spaces. Furthermore, dry-contact abrasive wear reasonably predicts the evolution of snow-slider contact area, and sliding-heat-source theory confirms that contact temperatures would not reach 0°C during our tribometer tests. Importantly, published measurements of interface temperatures also indicate that melting did not occur during field tests on sleds and skis. Although prevailing theory anticipates a transition from dry to lubricated contact along a slider, we suggest that dry-contact abrasion and heat flow can prevent this transition from occurring for snow-friction scenarios of practical interest.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000977/type/journal_articleabrasionhigh-resolution thermographyscanning-electron microscopysliding frictionsliding heat sourcetribologywear
spellingShingle JAMES H. LEVER
SUSAN TAYLOR
GARRETT R. HOCH
CHARLES DAGHLIAN
Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
Journal of Glaciology
abrasion
high-resolution thermography
scanning-electron microscopy
sliding friction
sliding heat source
tribology
wear
title Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_full Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_fullStr Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_short Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_sort evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
topic abrasion
high-resolution thermography
scanning-electron microscopy
sliding friction
sliding heat source
tribology
wear
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000977/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT jameshlever evidencethatabrasioncangovernsnowkineticfriction
AT susantaylor evidencethatabrasioncangovernsnowkineticfriction
AT garrettrhoch evidencethatabrasioncangovernsnowkineticfriction
AT charlesdaghlian evidencethatabrasioncangovernsnowkineticfriction