On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle

<p>According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino’s account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaana Eigi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Basque Country 2015-11-01
Series:Theoria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/13208
_version_ 1818114269631217664
author Jaana Eigi
author_facet Jaana Eigi
author_sort Jaana Eigi
collection DOAJ
description <p>According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino’s account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino's account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even for completely open individuals, criticism for maintaining objectivity is only possible in community. In the second part I challenge Biddle’s interpretation of Longino’s conception of the individual. I conclude that Longino’s account is necessarily social.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T03:48:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f4ef0f574fce4e08a02fb65a8ec74f17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0495-4548
2171-679X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T03:48:03Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher University of the Basque Country
record_format Article
series Theoria
spelling doaj.art-f4ef0f574fce4e08a02fb65a8ec74f172022-12-22T01:21:59ZengUniversity of the Basque CountryTheoria0495-45482171-679X2015-11-0130344946310.1387/theoria.1320811599On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin BiddleJaana Eigi0University of Tartu<p>According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino’s account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino's account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even for completely open individuals, criticism for maintaining objectivity is only possible in community. In the second part I challenge Biddle’s interpretation of Longino’s conception of the individual. I conclude that Longino’s account is necessarily social.</p>http://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/13208BiddleCollinscriticismepistemic subjectKuschLonginoobjectivitysocial epistemologyrule-followingtacit knowledge
spellingShingle Jaana Eigi
On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
Theoria
Biddle
Collins
criticism
epistemic subject
Kusch
Longino
objectivity
social epistemology
rule-following
tacit knowledge
title On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
title_full On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
title_fullStr On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
title_full_unstemmed On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
title_short On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle
title_sort on the social nature of objectivity helen longino and justin biddle
topic Biddle
Collins
criticism
epistemic subject
Kusch
Longino
objectivity
social epistemology
rule-following
tacit knowledge
url http://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/13208
work_keys_str_mv AT jaanaeigi onthesocialnatureofobjectivityhelenlonginoandjustinbiddle