RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a spectrum of respiratory illnesses in infants and young children that may lead to hospitalizations and a substantial number of outpatient visits, which result in a huge economic and healthcare burden. Most hospitalizations happen in otherwise healthy infants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanna Esposito, Bahaa Abu Raya, Eugenio Baraldi, Katie Flanagan, Federico Martinon Torres, Maria Tsolia, Stefan Zielen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.880368/full
_version_ 1811304086931243008
author Susanna Esposito
Bahaa Abu Raya
Eugenio Baraldi
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Federico Martinon Torres
Maria Tsolia
Stefan Zielen
author_facet Susanna Esposito
Bahaa Abu Raya
Eugenio Baraldi
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Federico Martinon Torres
Maria Tsolia
Stefan Zielen
author_sort Susanna Esposito
collection DOAJ
description Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a spectrum of respiratory illnesses in infants and young children that may lead to hospitalizations and a substantial number of outpatient visits, which result in a huge economic and healthcare burden. Most hospitalizations happen in otherwise healthy infants, highlighting the need to protect all infants against RSV. Moreover, there is evidence on the association between early-life RSV respiratory illness and recurrent wheezing/asthma-like symptoms As such, RSV is considered a global health priority. However, despite this, the only prevention strategy currently available is palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated in a subset of preterm infants or those with comorbidities, hence leaving the majority of the infant population unprotected against this virus. Therefore, development of prevention strategies against RSV for all infants entering their first RSV season constitutes a large unmet medical need. The aim of this review is to explore different immunization approaches to protect all infants against RSV. Prevention strategies include maternal immunization, immunization of infants with vaccines, immunization of infants with licensed mAbs (palivizumab), and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs (e.g., nirsevimab, MK-1654). Of these, palivizumab use is restricted to a small population of infants and does not offer a solution for all-infant protection, whereas vaccine development in infants has encountered various challenges, including the immaturity of the infant immune system, highlighting that future pediatric vaccines will most likely be used in older infants (>6 months of age) and children. Consequently, maternal immunization and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs represent the two feasible strategies for protection of all infants against RSV. Here, we present considerations regarding these two strategies covering key areas which include mechanism of action, “consistency” of protection, RSV variability, duration of protection, flexibility and optimal timing of immunization, benefit for the mother, programmatic implementation, and acceptance of each strategy by key stakeholders. We conclude that, based on current data, immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs might represent the most effective approach for protecting all infants entering their first RSV season.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:59:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f505d299dd374b9c811f6b9f6659720a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:59:43Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-f505d299dd374b9c811f6b9f6659720a2022-12-22T02:55:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242022-04-011310.3389/fimmu.2022.880368880368RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?Susanna Esposito0Bahaa Abu Raya1Eugenio Baraldi2Katie Flanagan3Katie Flanagan4Katie Flanagan5Katie Flanagan6Federico Martinon Torres7Maria Tsolia8Stefan Zielen9Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children’s Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, ItalyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, ItalySchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaTasmanian Vaccine Trial Centre, Clifford Craig Foundation, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, AustraliaGenetics, Vaccines, Infections and Pediatrics Research group (GENVIP), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, SpainSecond Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “A&P Kyriakou” Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece0Department for Children and Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a spectrum of respiratory illnesses in infants and young children that may lead to hospitalizations and a substantial number of outpatient visits, which result in a huge economic and healthcare burden. Most hospitalizations happen in otherwise healthy infants, highlighting the need to protect all infants against RSV. Moreover, there is evidence on the association between early-life RSV respiratory illness and recurrent wheezing/asthma-like symptoms As such, RSV is considered a global health priority. However, despite this, the only prevention strategy currently available is palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated in a subset of preterm infants or those with comorbidities, hence leaving the majority of the infant population unprotected against this virus. Therefore, development of prevention strategies against RSV for all infants entering their first RSV season constitutes a large unmet medical need. The aim of this review is to explore different immunization approaches to protect all infants against RSV. Prevention strategies include maternal immunization, immunization of infants with vaccines, immunization of infants with licensed mAbs (palivizumab), and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs (e.g., nirsevimab, MK-1654). Of these, palivizumab use is restricted to a small population of infants and does not offer a solution for all-infant protection, whereas vaccine development in infants has encountered various challenges, including the immaturity of the infant immune system, highlighting that future pediatric vaccines will most likely be used in older infants (>6 months of age) and children. Consequently, maternal immunization and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs represent the two feasible strategies for protection of all infants against RSV. Here, we present considerations regarding these two strategies covering key areas which include mechanism of action, “consistency” of protection, RSV variability, duration of protection, flexibility and optimal timing of immunization, benefit for the mother, programmatic implementation, and acceptance of each strategy by key stakeholders. We conclude that, based on current data, immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs might represent the most effective approach for protecting all infants entering their first RSV season.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.880368/fullasthmalower respiratory tract infectionmaternal immunizationmonoclonal antibodynirsevimabpalivizumab
spellingShingle Susanna Esposito
Bahaa Abu Raya
Eugenio Baraldi
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
Federico Martinon Torres
Maria Tsolia
Stefan Zielen
RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
Frontiers in Immunology
asthma
lower respiratory tract infection
maternal immunization
monoclonal antibody
nirsevimab
palivizumab
title RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
title_full RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
title_fullStr RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
title_full_unstemmed RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
title_short RSV Prevention in All Infants: Which Is the Most Preferable Strategy?
title_sort rsv prevention in all infants which is the most preferable strategy
topic asthma
lower respiratory tract infection
maternal immunization
monoclonal antibody
nirsevimab
palivizumab
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.880368/full
work_keys_str_mv AT susannaesposito rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT bahaaaburaya rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT eugeniobaraldi rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT katieflanagan rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT katieflanagan rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT katieflanagan rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT katieflanagan rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT federicomartinontorres rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT mariatsolia rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy
AT stefanzielen rsvpreventioninallinfantswhichisthemostpreferablestrategy