Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices
Building on our previous work, we assess how social solidarity towards migrants and refugees has changed before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, by collecting and analyzing a large, novel, and longitudinal dataset of migration-related tweets. To this end, we first annotate above 2000 tw...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tsinghua University Press
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Computing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.23919/JSC.2022.0003 |
_version_ | 1798028718308851712 |
---|---|
author | Steffen Eger Dan Liu Daniela Grunow |
author_facet | Steffen Eger Dan Liu Daniela Grunow |
author_sort | Steffen Eger |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Building on our previous work, we assess how social solidarity towards migrants and refugees has changed before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, by collecting and analyzing a large, novel, and longitudinal dataset of migration-related tweets. To this end, we first annotate above 2000 tweets for (anti-) solidarity expressions towards immigrants, utilizing two annotation approaches (experts vs. crowds). On these annotations, we train a BERT model with multiple data augmentation strategies, which performs close to the human upper bound. We use this high-quality model to automatically label over 240 000 tweets between September 2019 and June 2021. We then assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to migrant (anti-)solidarity developed over time, before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Our findings show that migrant solidarity became increasingly salient and contested during the early stages of the pandemic but declined in importance since late 2020, with tweet numbers falling slightly below pre-pandemic levels in summer 2021. During the same period, the share of anti-solidarity tweets increased in a sub-sample of COVID-19-related tweets. These findings highlight the importance of long-term observation, pre- and post-crisis comparison, and sampling in research interested in crisis related effects. As one of our main contributions, we outline potential pitfalls of an analysis of social solidarity trends: for example, the ratio of solidarity and anti-solidarity statements depends on the sampling design, i.e., tweet language, Twitter-user accounts’ national identification (country known or unknown) and selection of relevant tweets. In our sample, the share of anti-solidarity tweets is higher in native (German) language tweets and among “anonymous” Twitter users writing in German compared to English-language tweets of users located in Germany. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:12:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f5090cedc403432d9b6af6c5a84e8c02 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2688-5255 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:12:25Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | Tsinghua University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Social Computing |
spelling | doaj.art-f5090cedc403432d9b6af6c5a84e8c022022-12-22T04:07:34ZengTsinghua University PressJournal of Social Computing2688-52552022-06-013213915710.23919/JSC.2022.0003Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design ChoicesSteffen Eger0Dan Liu1Daniela Grunow2Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, GermanyComputer Science Department, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt 64289, GermanyFaculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt 60629, GermanyBuilding on our previous work, we assess how social solidarity towards migrants and refugees has changed before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, by collecting and analyzing a large, novel, and longitudinal dataset of migration-related tweets. To this end, we first annotate above 2000 tweets for (anti-) solidarity expressions towards immigrants, utilizing two annotation approaches (experts vs. crowds). On these annotations, we train a BERT model with multiple data augmentation strategies, which performs close to the human upper bound. We use this high-quality model to automatically label over 240 000 tweets between September 2019 and June 2021. We then assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to migrant (anti-)solidarity developed over time, before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Our findings show that migrant solidarity became increasingly salient and contested during the early stages of the pandemic but declined in importance since late 2020, with tweet numbers falling slightly below pre-pandemic levels in summer 2021. During the same period, the share of anti-solidarity tweets increased in a sub-sample of COVID-19-related tweets. These findings highlight the importance of long-term observation, pre- and post-crisis comparison, and sampling in research interested in crisis related effects. As one of our main contributions, we outline potential pitfalls of an analysis of social solidarity trends: for example, the ratio of solidarity and anti-solidarity statements depends on the sampling design, i.e., tweet language, Twitter-user accounts’ national identification (country known or unknown) and selection of relevant tweets. In our sample, the share of anti-solidarity tweets is higher in native (German) language tweets and among “anonymous” Twitter users writing in German compared to English-language tweets of users located in Germany.https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.23919/JSC.2022.0003social solidaritycrisescovid-19natural language processing |
spellingShingle | Steffen Eger Dan Liu Daniela Grunow Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices Journal of Social Computing social solidarity crises covid-19 natural language processing |
title | Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices |
title_full | Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices |
title_fullStr | Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices |
title_short | Measuring Social Solidarity During Crisis: The Role of Design Choices |
title_sort | measuring social solidarity during crisis the role of design choices |
topic | social solidarity crises covid-19 natural language processing |
url | https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.23919/JSC.2022.0003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steffeneger measuringsocialsolidarityduringcrisistheroleofdesignchoices AT danliu measuringsocialsolidarityduringcrisistheroleofdesignchoices AT danielagrunow measuringsocialsolidarityduringcrisistheroleofdesignchoices |