Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management

It is incontrovertible that an exchange of files is essentially required at several stages of the workflow in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Therefore, investigating and detecting the capabilities/inabilities of building information modeling (BIM) software packages w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Iapige De Gaetani, Mertkan Mert, Federica Migliaccio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4437
_version_ 1797563978933600256
author Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Mertkan Mert
Federica Migliaccio
author_facet Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Mertkan Mert
Federica Migliaccio
author_sort Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
collection DOAJ
description It is incontrovertible that an exchange of files is essentially required at several stages of the workflow in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Therefore, investigating and detecting the capabilities/inabilities of building information modeling (BIM) software packages with respect to interoperability can be informative to stakeholders who exchange data between various BIM packages. The work presented in this paper includes a discussion on the interoperability of different software platforms commonly used in the AEC industry. Although, in theory, flawless interoperability of some types of files between different BIM platforms is ensured, in practical applications, this is not always the case. Hence, this research aims to identify faults in data exchange by assessing different possible scenarios where a sample Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) four-dimensions (4D) BIM model and related Gantt charts are exchanged. Throughout the interoperability analysis of both IFC file and Gantt charts, the following checks were carried out: geometrical and nongeometrical information exchange through IFC files, 4D information correct readability, and presence of missing schedule information in Gantt charts after their import/export procedure. The results show that interoperability between the analyzed platforms is not always ensured, providing useful insight into realistic scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:50:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f50add51493a47c5afda870fb602e874
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:50:52Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f50add51493a47c5afda870fb602e8742023-11-20T05:09:44ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-06-011013443710.3390/app10134437Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction ManagementCarlo Iapige De Gaetani0Mertkan Mert1Federica Migliaccio2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyIt is incontrovertible that an exchange of files is essentially required at several stages of the workflow in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Therefore, investigating and detecting the capabilities/inabilities of building information modeling (BIM) software packages with respect to interoperability can be informative to stakeholders who exchange data between various BIM packages. The work presented in this paper includes a discussion on the interoperability of different software platforms commonly used in the AEC industry. Although, in theory, flawless interoperability of some types of files between different BIM platforms is ensured, in practical applications, this is not always the case. Hence, this research aims to identify faults in data exchange by assessing different possible scenarios where a sample Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) four-dimensions (4D) BIM model and related Gantt charts are exchanged. Throughout the interoperability analysis of both IFC file and Gantt charts, the following checks were carried out: geometrical and nongeometrical information exchange through IFC files, 4D information correct readability, and presence of missing schedule information in Gantt charts after their import/export procedure. The results show that interoperability between the analyzed platforms is not always ensured, providing useful insight into realistic scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4437BIMinteroperabilityIFCproject managementGantt chart
spellingShingle Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Mertkan Mert
Federica Migliaccio
Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
Applied Sciences
BIM
interoperability
IFC
project management
Gantt chart
title Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
title_full Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
title_fullStr Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
title_full_unstemmed Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
title_short Interoperability Analyses of BIM Platforms for Construction Management
title_sort interoperability analyses of bim platforms for construction management
topic BIM
interoperability
IFC
project management
Gantt chart
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4437
work_keys_str_mv AT carloiapigedegaetani interoperabilityanalysesofbimplatformsforconstructionmanagement
AT mertkanmert interoperabilityanalysesofbimplatformsforconstructionmanagement
AT federicamigliaccio interoperabilityanalysesofbimplatformsforconstructionmanagement