Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes

The paper presents a case study on written dialectality. The material used for the research is the Eastern Aukštaitian (EA) texts published in the almanacs titled “A Waking Spring” (“Bundanti versmė”) (2013, 2014). The paper develops an approach for “reading” written dialectality, provides theoreti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daiva Aliūkaitė, Violeta Meiliūnaitė
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University Press 2022-11-01
Series:Verbum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/29837
_version_ 1811179939930570752
author Daiva Aliūkaitė
Violeta Meiliūnaitė
author_facet Daiva Aliūkaitė
Violeta Meiliūnaitė
author_sort Daiva Aliūkaitė
collection DOAJ
description The paper presents a case study on written dialectality. The material used for the research is the Eastern Aukštaitian (EA) texts published in the almanacs titled “A Waking Spring” (“Bundanti versmė”) (2013, 2014). The paper develops an approach for “reading” written dialectality, provides theoretical insights about the concept of a dialect grapholect, presents a dialectological analysis of the EA texts, assessing the vitality of the distinctive features, and also includes commentary on the non-standard spelling choices applied to reflect these features through the grapholect. In the given paper written dialectality is considered to be an indication of the vitality and continuity of dialectal codes because, unlike in oral dialectality, the informants-authors put effort into demonstrating dialect. The distinctive features of the EA and of its subdialects represented in the grapholects suggest the idea of their vitality in apparent time. The orthographic choices of the informants-authors are considered as dialect respelling. The EA grapholect is found to be fluctuating, while the orthographic choices for conveying the features of the subdialects are somewhat more stable, however, still in a stage of development as well. Therefore, it is more accurate to discuss the grapholects (plural), rather than a grapholect (singular) of the EA or the subdialect.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:43:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f51645e99a7340c89f741c40b32ca16e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2029-6223
2538-8746
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:43:07Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Verbum
spelling doaj.art-f51645e99a7340c89f741c40b32ca16e2022-12-22T04:39:28ZdeuVilnius University PressVerbum2029-62232538-87462022-11-011310.15388/Verb.31Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal CodesDaiva Aliūkaitė0Violeta Meiliūnaitė1Institute of the Lithuanian LanguageInstitute of the Lithuanian Language The paper presents a case study on written dialectality. The material used for the research is the Eastern Aukštaitian (EA) texts published in the almanacs titled “A Waking Spring” (“Bundanti versmė”) (2013, 2014). The paper develops an approach for “reading” written dialectality, provides theoretical insights about the concept of a dialect grapholect, presents a dialectological analysis of the EA texts, assessing the vitality of the distinctive features, and also includes commentary on the non-standard spelling choices applied to reflect these features through the grapholect. In the given paper written dialectality is considered to be an indication of the vitality and continuity of dialectal codes because, unlike in oral dialectality, the informants-authors put effort into demonstrating dialect. The distinctive features of the EA and of its subdialects represented in the grapholects suggest the idea of their vitality in apparent time. The orthographic choices of the informants-authors are considered as dialect respelling. The EA grapholect is found to be fluctuating, while the orthographic choices for conveying the features of the subdialects are somewhat more stable, however, still in a stage of development as well. Therefore, it is more accurate to discuss the grapholects (plural), rather than a grapholect (singular) of the EA or the subdialect. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/29837dialect grapholectwritten dialectalityoral dialectalitydistinctive featuresEastern Aukštaitian dialect
spellingShingle Daiva Aliūkaitė
Violeta Meiliūnaitė
Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
Verbum
dialect grapholect
written dialectality
oral dialectality
distinctive features
Eastern Aukštaitian dialect
title Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
title_full Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
title_fullStr Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
title_full_unstemmed Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
title_short Dialect Grapholects at the Beginning of the 21st Century as a Manifestation of the Vitality and Continuity of Dialectal Codes
title_sort dialect grapholects at the beginning of the 21st century as a manifestation of the vitality and continuity of dialectal codes
topic dialect grapholect
written dialectality
oral dialectality
distinctive features
Eastern Aukštaitian dialect
url https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/verbum/article/view/29837
work_keys_str_mv AT daivaaliukaite dialectgrapholectsatthebeginningofthe21stcenturyasamanifestationofthevitalityandcontinuityofdialectalcodes
AT violetameiliunaite dialectgrapholectsatthebeginningofthe21stcenturyasamanifestationofthevitalityandcontinuityofdialectalcodes