The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Induction programme for trainee doctors in the UK generally do not focus on the surgical aspects of their jobs. In this context we decided to conduct a telephonic survey among the hospitals belonging to three orthopaedic training reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wong Shaun KS, Oakley J, Kumar AJ Shyam, Philips Steve J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-10-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/1/104
_version_ 1818758436796497920
author Wong Shaun KS
Oakley J
Kumar AJ Shyam
Philips Steve J
author_facet Wong Shaun KS
Oakley J
Kumar AJ Shyam
Philips Steve J
author_sort Wong Shaun KS
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Induction programme for trainee doctors in the UK generally do not focus on the surgical aspects of their jobs. In this context we decided to conduct a telephonic survey among the hospitals belonging to three orthopaedic training regions in the UK from the point of view of the diversity of instrumentations and implants used for index procedures.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose four index trauma & orthopaedic procedures (Total hip replacement, total knee replacement, intramedullary nailing and external fixator systems for long bone fractures). A telephonic survey was done in six NHS trust hospitals which were part of an orthopaedic training rotation (2 from England, 2 from Wales and 2 from Scotland). In total there were 39 different instrumentation systems for these 4 index procedures in the 6 trusts (see table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). These comprise 12 Total hip replacement (THR) systems, 14 total knee replacement (TKR) systems, 9 intra-medullary nailing systems, and 4 external fixator systems. The number of different systems for each trust ranged from 7 to 19. There is a vast array of implants and instrumentation systems in each trust, as highlighted by our survey. The surgical tools are not the same in each hospitals. This situation is more complicated when trainees move to new hospitals as part of training rotations.</p> <tbl id="T1"> <title> <p>Table 1</p> </title> <caption> <p>Number of implants/instrumentations used in each of the 6 UK trusts (3 training regions).</p> </caption> <tblbdy cols="7"> <r> <c ca="left"> <p>IMPLANT</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>E1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>E2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>W1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>W2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>S1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>S2</p> </c> </r> <r> <c cspan="7"> <hr/> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Total Knee Replacement</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>5</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Total Hip Replacement</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>6</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Intramnedullary nailing</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>6</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>External fixators</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> </r> <r> <c cspan="7"> <hr/> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>TOTAL</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>11</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>13</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>8</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>18</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>9</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>9</p> </c> </r> </tblbdy> <tblfn> <p>E = England, W = Wales, S = Scotland</p> </tblfn> </tbl> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In view of this we feel that more focused theatre based induction programmes for higher surgical trainees is advocated in each hospital trust so trainees can familiarise themselves with the tools available to them. This could include discussion with the consultants and senior theatre staff along with representatives from the companies supplying the implants and instrumentation systems.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:26:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f519193da1624941962dbd7884f3df2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:26:48Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-f519193da1624941962dbd7884f3df2b2022-12-21T21:18:00ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002008-10-011110410.1186/1756-0500-1-104The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programmeWong Shaun KSOakley JKumar AJ ShyamPhilips Steve J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Induction programme for trainee doctors in the UK generally do not focus on the surgical aspects of their jobs. In this context we decided to conduct a telephonic survey among the hospitals belonging to three orthopaedic training regions in the UK from the point of view of the diversity of instrumentations and implants used for index procedures.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose four index trauma & orthopaedic procedures (Total hip replacement, total knee replacement, intramedullary nailing and external fixator systems for long bone fractures). A telephonic survey was done in six NHS trust hospitals which were part of an orthopaedic training rotation (2 from England, 2 from Wales and 2 from Scotland). In total there were 39 different instrumentation systems for these 4 index procedures in the 6 trusts (see table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). These comprise 12 Total hip replacement (THR) systems, 14 total knee replacement (TKR) systems, 9 intra-medullary nailing systems, and 4 external fixator systems. The number of different systems for each trust ranged from 7 to 19. There is a vast array of implants and instrumentation systems in each trust, as highlighted by our survey. The surgical tools are not the same in each hospitals. This situation is more complicated when trainees move to new hospitals as part of training rotations.</p> <tbl id="T1"> <title> <p>Table 1</p> </title> <caption> <p>Number of implants/instrumentations used in each of the 6 UK trusts (3 training regions).</p> </caption> <tblbdy cols="7"> <r> <c ca="left"> <p>IMPLANT</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>E1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>E2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>W1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>W2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>S1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>S2</p> </c> </r> <r> <c cspan="7"> <hr/> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Total Knee Replacement</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>5</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Total Hip Replacement</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>4</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>6</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>Intramnedullary nailing</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>6</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>External fixators</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>3</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>2</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>1</p> </c> </r> <r> <c cspan="7"> <hr/> </c> </r> <r> <c ca="left"> <p><it>TOTAL</it></p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>11</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>13</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>8</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>18</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>9</p> </c> <c ca="center"> <p>9</p> </c> </r> </tblbdy> <tblfn> <p>E = England, W = Wales, S = Scotland</p> </tblfn> </tbl> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In view of this we feel that more focused theatre based induction programmes for higher surgical trainees is advocated in each hospital trust so trainees can familiarise themselves with the tools available to them. This could include discussion with the consultants and senior theatre staff along with representatives from the companies supplying the implants and instrumentation systems.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/1/104
spellingShingle Wong Shaun KS
Oakley J
Kumar AJ Shyam
Philips Steve J
The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
BMC Research Notes
title The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
title_full The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
title_fullStr The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
title_full_unstemmed The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
title_short The surgeon and his tools-the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
title_sort surgeon and his tools the case for a focused orthopaedic theatre induction programme
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/1/104
work_keys_str_mv AT wongshaunks thesurgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT oakleyj thesurgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT kumarajshyam thesurgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT philipsstevej thesurgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT wongshaunks surgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT oakleyj surgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT kumarajshyam surgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme
AT philipsstevej surgeonandhistoolsthecaseforafocusedorthopaedictheatreinductionprogramme