16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections through a systematic review and meta-analysis.A computerized literature search was conducted to identify studies that assessed the diagnos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guoming Su, Zhuqing Fu, Liren Hu, Yueying Wang, Zuguo Zhao, Weiqing Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4440735?pdf=render
_version_ 1828386157269876736
author Guoming Su
Zhuqing Fu
Liren Hu
Yueying Wang
Zuguo Zhao
Weiqing Yang
author_facet Guoming Su
Zhuqing Fu
Liren Hu
Yueying Wang
Zuguo Zhao
Weiqing Yang
author_sort Guoming Su
collection DOAJ
description We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections through a systematic review and meta-analysis.A computerized literature search was conducted to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic value of 16S rRNA gene PCR test for bloodstream infections. Study quality was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to summarize overall test performance. Statistical analysis was performed in Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata/SE 12.0 software.Twenty-eight studies were included in our meta-analysis. Using random-effect model analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), 12.65 (95% CI, 8.04-19.90), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08-0.24), and 116.76 (95% CI, 52.02-262.05), respectively. The SROC curve indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9690 and the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity (Q*) was 0.9183. In addition, heterogeneity was statistically significant but was not caused by the threshold effect.Existing data suggest that 16S rRNA gene PCR test is a practical tool for the rapid screening of sepsis. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the diagnostic value of PCR amplification and DNA microarray hybridization of 16S rRNA gene in the future.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:32:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f53a5aa6e0364d59829b10b7c54099d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:32:22Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f53a5aa6e0364d59829b10b7c54099d12022-12-22T02:00:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012719510.1371/journal.pone.012719516S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Guoming SuZhuqing FuLiren HuYueying WangZuguo ZhaoWeiqing YangWe aim to evaluate the accuracy of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections through a systematic review and meta-analysis.A computerized literature search was conducted to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic value of 16S rRNA gene PCR test for bloodstream infections. Study quality was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to summarize overall test performance. Statistical analysis was performed in Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata/SE 12.0 software.Twenty-eight studies were included in our meta-analysis. Using random-effect model analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), 12.65 (95% CI, 8.04-19.90), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08-0.24), and 116.76 (95% CI, 52.02-262.05), respectively. The SROC curve indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9690 and the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity (Q*) was 0.9183. In addition, heterogeneity was statistically significant but was not caused by the threshold effect.Existing data suggest that 16S rRNA gene PCR test is a practical tool for the rapid screening of sepsis. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the diagnostic value of PCR amplification and DNA microarray hybridization of 16S rRNA gene in the future.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4440735?pdf=render
spellingShingle Guoming Su
Zhuqing Fu
Liren Hu
Yueying Wang
Zuguo Zhao
Weiqing Yang
16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS ONE
title 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_fullStr 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full_unstemmed 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_short 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_sort 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections a systematic review and meta analysis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4440735?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT guomingsu 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuqingfu 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lirenhu 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yueyingwang 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zuguozhao 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weiqingyang 16sribosomalribonucleicacidgenepolymerasechainreactioninthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis