Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task

Social proximity has since ever been evaluated as positive. However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reduced our social relations to avoid spreading the contagion. The present study aims to investigate people's current assessment of social proximity by using an affective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Scerrati, Stefania D'Ascenzo, Roberto Nicoletti, Caterina Villani, Luisa Lugli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730/full
_version_ 1817970039060430848
author Elisa Scerrati
Stefania D'Ascenzo
Roberto Nicoletti
Caterina Villani
Luisa Lugli
author_facet Elisa Scerrati
Stefania D'Ascenzo
Roberto Nicoletti
Caterina Villani
Luisa Lugli
author_sort Elisa Scerrati
collection DOAJ
description Social proximity has since ever been evaluated as positive. However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reduced our social relations to avoid spreading the contagion. The present study aims to investigate people's current assessment of social proximity by using an affective priming paradigm (APP). We hypothesized that if our evaluation of social proximity is positive, then words with positive valence (e.g., relaxed) should be processed faster when preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. On the contrary, if our evaluation of social proximity is turning negative, then words with a negative valence (e.g., sad) should be processed faster when preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. To this end, we presented participants with prime images showing line drawings representing humans in situations of proximity or distancing and asked them to evaluate the valence (i.e., positive or negative) of a subsequent target word. In a follow-up session, the same participants evaluated the prime images as being positively or negatively valenced. Results showed that a large subset of participants who rated the prime images of social proximity as positive also processed positive words faster when these were preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. Conversely, a smaller subset of participants who rated the prime images of social proximity as less positive processed negative words faster when these were preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. These results suggest individual differences in the assessment of social proximity likely driven by the pandemic.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:29:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f53d6ab4caae419c9bb66ceee56d03af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:29:07Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-f53d6ab4caae419c9bb66ceee56d03af2022-12-22T02:31:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-06-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730901730Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming TaskElisa Scerrati0Stefania D'Ascenzo1Roberto Nicoletti2Caterina Villani3Luisa Lugli4Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, ItalyDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalySocial proximity has since ever been evaluated as positive. However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reduced our social relations to avoid spreading the contagion. The present study aims to investigate people's current assessment of social proximity by using an affective priming paradigm (APP). We hypothesized that if our evaluation of social proximity is positive, then words with positive valence (e.g., relaxed) should be processed faster when preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. On the contrary, if our evaluation of social proximity is turning negative, then words with a negative valence (e.g., sad) should be processed faster when preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. To this end, we presented participants with prime images showing line drawings representing humans in situations of proximity or distancing and asked them to evaluate the valence (i.e., positive or negative) of a subsequent target word. In a follow-up session, the same participants evaluated the prime images as being positively or negatively valenced. Results showed that a large subset of participants who rated the prime images of social proximity as positive also processed positive words faster when these were preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. Conversely, a smaller subset of participants who rated the prime images of social proximity as less positive processed negative words faster when these were preceded by images of social proximity than social distancing. These results suggest individual differences in the assessment of social proximity likely driven by the pandemic.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730/fullpandemicsocial distancingprime imagestarget wordsaffective priminginterpersonal proximity
spellingShingle Elisa Scerrati
Stefania D'Ascenzo
Roberto Nicoletti
Caterina Villani
Luisa Lugli
Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
Frontiers in Psychology
pandemic
social distancing
prime images
target words
affective priming
interpersonal proximity
title Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
title_full Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
title_fullStr Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
title_short Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task
title_sort assessing interpersonal proximity evaluation in the covid 19 era evidence from the affective priming task
topic pandemic
social distancing
prime images
target words
affective priming
interpersonal proximity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elisascerrati assessinginterpersonalproximityevaluationinthecovid19eraevidencefromtheaffectiveprimingtask
AT stefaniadascenzo assessinginterpersonalproximityevaluationinthecovid19eraevidencefromtheaffectiveprimingtask
AT robertonicoletti assessinginterpersonalproximityevaluationinthecovid19eraevidencefromtheaffectiveprimingtask
AT caterinavillani assessinginterpersonalproximityevaluationinthecovid19eraevidencefromtheaffectiveprimingtask
AT luisalugli assessinginterpersonalproximityevaluationinthecovid19eraevidencefromtheaffectiveprimingtask