Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer.  Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narendra Pandit, B R Mittal, Nandita Kakkar, G R Verma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Surgeons of Nepal 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387
_version_ 1827823646926700544
author Narendra Pandit
B R Mittal
Nandita Kakkar
G R Verma
author_facet Narendra Pandit
B R Mittal
Nandita Kakkar
G R Verma
author_sort Narendra Pandit
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer.  Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in predicting pathological response after NACRT in carcinoma rectum. Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent NACRT comprising of external beam radiotherapy and concomitant infusional 5-FU based chemotherapy. It was followed 6 weeks later by total mesorectal excision. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT before and minimum 6 weeks after the completion of NACRT. Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was calculated. The tumor regression grade (TRG) in resected specimen was scored according to the Mandard criteria. TRG 1-2 was considered as responders and TRG 3-5, non-responders. The SUVmax within the tumor was correlated to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Results: Fourteen of 30 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation.  Following NACRT, 7 (50%) patients were classified as responders (TRG 1-2) and 7 (50%) non-responders (TRG 3-5). There were no significant differences in pre NACRT SUVmax between responders (12.05±2.81) and non-responders (17.65±7.20) (p=0.079). The mean post-NACRT SUVmax was significantly lower in responders than non-responders (6.4 vs 10.8; p=0.024). To compare the response using ROC curve analysis (AUC=0.83), and considering a cut-off post SUVmax as 7.0, the sensitivity was 57.14%, specificity 71.43%, positive predictive value (PPV) 66.67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 62.50%, and the overall accuracy  was 64.28%  to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that 18FDG-PET/CT could be a potentially useful tool in predicting response after NACRT in locally advanced rectal cancer.  Post SUVmax  of 7.0  appears to be the best predictor tumor response following NACRT.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:14:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f547e0f9c1c547b29d2bacccfd651dbc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1815-3984
2392-4772
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:14:40Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Society of Surgeons of Nepal
record_format Article
series Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
spelling doaj.art-f547e0f9c1c547b29d2bacccfd651dbc2023-09-06T10:07:08ZengSociety of Surgeons of NepalJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal1815-39842392-47722023-08-0126110.3126/jssn.v26i1.57387Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal CancerNarendra Pandit0B R Mittal1Nandita Kakkar2G R Verma3Department of GI Surgery, Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital (BMCTH), Biratnagar, NepalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer.  Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in predicting pathological response after NACRT in carcinoma rectum. Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent NACRT comprising of external beam radiotherapy and concomitant infusional 5-FU based chemotherapy. It was followed 6 weeks later by total mesorectal excision. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT before and minimum 6 weeks after the completion of NACRT. Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was calculated. The tumor regression grade (TRG) in resected specimen was scored according to the Mandard criteria. TRG 1-2 was considered as responders and TRG 3-5, non-responders. The SUVmax within the tumor was correlated to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Results: Fourteen of 30 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation.  Following NACRT, 7 (50%) patients were classified as responders (TRG 1-2) and 7 (50%) non-responders (TRG 3-5). There were no significant differences in pre NACRT SUVmax between responders (12.05±2.81) and non-responders (17.65±7.20) (p=0.079). The mean post-NACRT SUVmax was significantly lower in responders than non-responders (6.4 vs 10.8; p=0.024). To compare the response using ROC curve analysis (AUC=0.83), and considering a cut-off post SUVmax as 7.0, the sensitivity was 57.14%, specificity 71.43%, positive predictive value (PPV) 66.67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 62.50%, and the overall accuracy  was 64.28%  to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that 18FDG-PET/CT could be a potentially useful tool in predicting response after NACRT in locally advanced rectal cancer.  Post SUVmax  of 7.0  appears to be the best predictor tumor response following NACRT. https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387ChemoradiotherapyPET/CTRectal cancerTumor regression
spellingShingle Narendra Pandit
B R Mittal
Nandita Kakkar
G R Verma
Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
Chemoradiotherapy
PET/CT
Rectal cancer
Tumor regression
title Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
title_full Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
title_short Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
title_sort efficacy of 18fdg pet ct in predicting response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer
topic Chemoradiotherapy
PET/CT
Rectal cancer
Tumor regression
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387
work_keys_str_mv AT narendrapandit efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer
AT brmittal efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer
AT nanditakakkar efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer
AT grverma efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer