Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer
Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer. Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society of Surgeons of Nepal
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387 |
_version_ | 1827823646926700544 |
---|---|
author | Narendra Pandit B R Mittal Nandita Kakkar G R Verma |
author_facet | Narendra Pandit B R Mittal Nandita Kakkar G R Verma |
author_sort | Narendra Pandit |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer. Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in predicting pathological response after NACRT in carcinoma rectum.
Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent NACRT comprising of external beam radiotherapy and concomitant infusional 5-FU based chemotherapy. It was followed 6 weeks later by total mesorectal excision. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT before and minimum 6 weeks after the completion of NACRT. Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was calculated. The tumor regression grade (TRG) in resected specimen was scored according to the Mandard criteria. TRG 1-2 was considered as responders and TRG 3-5, non-responders. The SUVmax within the tumor was correlated to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders.
Results: Fourteen of 30 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following NACRT, 7 (50%) patients were classified as responders (TRG 1-2) and 7 (50%) non-responders (TRG 3-5). There were no significant differences in pre NACRT SUVmax between responders (12.05±2.81) and non-responders (17.65±7.20) (p=0.079). The mean post-NACRT SUVmax was significantly lower in responders than non-responders (6.4 vs 10.8; p=0.024). To compare the response using ROC curve analysis (AUC=0.83), and considering a cut-off post SUVmax as 7.0, the sensitivity was 57.14%, specificity 71.43%, positive predictive value (PPV) 66.67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 62.50%, and the overall accuracy was 64.28% to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders.
Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that 18FDG-PET/CT could be a potentially useful tool in predicting response after NACRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. Post SUVmax of 7.0 appears to be the best predictor tumor response following NACRT.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:14:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f547e0f9c1c547b29d2bacccfd651dbc |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1815-3984 2392-4772 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:14:40Z |
publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
publisher | Society of Surgeons of Nepal |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal |
spelling | doaj.art-f547e0f9c1c547b29d2bacccfd651dbc2023-09-06T10:07:08ZengSociety of Surgeons of NepalJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal1815-39842392-47722023-08-0126110.3126/jssn.v26i1.57387Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal CancerNarendra Pandit0B R Mittal1Nandita Kakkar2G R Verma3Department of GI Surgery, Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital (BMCTH), Biratnagar, NepalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) may result in significant response in rectal cancer. Conventional imaging may not be accurate. 18FDG-PET/CT scan has shown promising results for monitoring the response to NACRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET/CT scan in predicting pathological response after NACRT in carcinoma rectum. Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent NACRT comprising of external beam radiotherapy and concomitant infusional 5-FU based chemotherapy. It was followed 6 weeks later by total mesorectal excision. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT before and minimum 6 weeks after the completion of NACRT. Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was calculated. The tumor regression grade (TRG) in resected specimen was scored according to the Mandard criteria. TRG 1-2 was considered as responders and TRG 3-5, non-responders. The SUVmax within the tumor was correlated to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Results: Fourteen of 30 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following NACRT, 7 (50%) patients were classified as responders (TRG 1-2) and 7 (50%) non-responders (TRG 3-5). There were no significant differences in pre NACRT SUVmax between responders (12.05±2.81) and non-responders (17.65±7.20) (p=0.079). The mean post-NACRT SUVmax was significantly lower in responders than non-responders (6.4 vs 10.8; p=0.024). To compare the response using ROC curve analysis (AUC=0.83), and considering a cut-off post SUVmax as 7.0, the sensitivity was 57.14%, specificity 71.43%, positive predictive value (PPV) 66.67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 62.50%, and the overall accuracy was 64.28% to differentiate pathological responders from non-responders. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that 18FDG-PET/CT could be a potentially useful tool in predicting response after NACRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. Post SUVmax of 7.0 appears to be the best predictor tumor response following NACRT. https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387ChemoradiotherapyPET/CTRectal cancerTumor regression |
spellingShingle | Narendra Pandit B R Mittal Nandita Kakkar G R Verma Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal Chemoradiotherapy PET/CT Rectal cancer Tumor regression |
title | Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer |
title_full | Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer |
title_short | Efficacy Of 18FDG-PET/CT In Predicting Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation In Rectal Cancer |
title_sort | efficacy of 18fdg pet ct in predicting response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer |
topic | Chemoradiotherapy PET/CT Rectal cancer Tumor regression |
url | https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/57387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narendrapandit efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer AT brmittal efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer AT nanditakakkar efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer AT grverma efficacyof18fdgpetctinpredictingresponseafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationinrectalcancer |