Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching

Background: In recent years, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become increasingly common. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of single-port and triple-port VATS lobectomy. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyung Sub Song, Chang Kwon Park, Jae Bum Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017-10-01
Series:Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.339
_version_ 1811266496668631040
author Kyung Sub Song
Chang Kwon Park
Jae Bum Kim
author_facet Kyung Sub Song
Chang Kwon Park
Jae Bum Kim
author_sort Kyung Sub Song
collection DOAJ
description Background: In recent years, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become increasingly common. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of single-port and triple-port VATS lobectomy. Methods: A total of 73 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS lobectomy from December 2011 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, including 47 in the triple-port group and 26 in the single-port group. Statistical analysis was performed after propensity score matching. Patients were matched on a 1-to-1 basis. Results: Operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the triple-port group and the single-port group were similar (189.4±50.8 minutes vs. 205.4±50.6 minutes, p=0.259; 286.5±531.0 mL vs. 314.6±513.1 mL, p=0.813). There were no cases of morbidity or mortality. No significant differences in complications or the total number of dissected lymph nodes were found between the 2 groups. In the single-port group, more mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected than in the triple-port group (1.7±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.5, p=0.011). Both groups had 1 patient with bronchopleural fistula. Chest tube duration and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the single- port group than in the triple-port group (8.7±5.1 days vs. 6.2±6.6 days, p=0.130; 11.7±6.1 days vs. 9.5±6.4 days, p=0.226). However, the differences were not statistically significant. In the single-port group, the rate of conversion to multi-port VATS lobectomy was 11.5% (3 of 26). The rates of conversion to open thoracotomy in the triple-port and single-port groups were 7.7% and 3.8%, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion: In comparison with the triple-port group, single-port VATS lobectomy showed similar results in safety and efficacy, indicating that single-port VATS lobectomy is a feasible and safe option for lung cancer patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:44:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5484a8bd1684cb4b04e870f73c945b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2233-601X
2093-6516
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:44:18Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format Article
series Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
spelling doaj.art-f5484a8bd1684cb4b04e870f73c945b62022-12-22T03:17:20ZengKorean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryKorean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2233-601X2093-65162017-10-0150533934510.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.339Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score MatchingKyung Sub Song0Chang Kwon Park1Jae Bum Kim2Keimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterKeimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterKeimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterBackground: In recent years, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become increasingly common. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of single-port and triple-port VATS lobectomy. Methods: A total of 73 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS lobectomy from December 2011 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, including 47 in the triple-port group and 26 in the single-port group. Statistical analysis was performed after propensity score matching. Patients were matched on a 1-to-1 basis. Results: Operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the triple-port group and the single-port group were similar (189.4±50.8 minutes vs. 205.4±50.6 minutes, p=0.259; 286.5±531.0 mL vs. 314.6±513.1 mL, p=0.813). There were no cases of morbidity or mortality. No significant differences in complications or the total number of dissected lymph nodes were found between the 2 groups. In the single-port group, more mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected than in the triple-port group (1.7±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.5, p=0.011). Both groups had 1 patient with bronchopleural fistula. Chest tube duration and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the single- port group than in the triple-port group (8.7±5.1 days vs. 6.2±6.6 days, p=0.130; 11.7±6.1 days vs. 9.5±6.4 days, p=0.226). However, the differences were not statistically significant. In the single-port group, the rate of conversion to multi-port VATS lobectomy was 11.5% (3 of 26). The rates of conversion to open thoracotomy in the triple-port and single-port groups were 7.7% and 3.8%, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion: In comparison with the triple-port group, single-port VATS lobectomy showed similar results in safety and efficacy, indicating that single-port VATS lobectomy is a feasible and safe option for lung cancer patients.http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.339Video-assisted thoracic surgeryLobectomyLung neoplasms
spellingShingle Kyung Sub Song
Chang Kwon Park
Jae Bum Kim
Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Video-assisted thoracic surgery
Lobectomy
Lung neoplasms
title Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
title_full Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
title_fullStr Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
title_short Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
title_sort efficacy of single port video assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy compared with triple port vats by propensity score matching
topic Video-assisted thoracic surgery
Lobectomy
Lung neoplasms
url http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.339
work_keys_str_mv AT kyungsubsong efficacyofsingleportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgerylobectomycomparedwithtripleportvatsbypropensityscorematching
AT changkwonpark efficacyofsingleportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgerylobectomycomparedwithtripleportvatsbypropensityscorematching
AT jaebumkim efficacyofsingleportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgerylobectomycomparedwithtripleportvatsbypropensityscorematching