Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations

This study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Willibald Friedrich Ruch, Jennifer Hofmann, Tracey Platt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies 2013-03-01
Series:The European Journal of Humour Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19
_version_ 1818417035803099136
author Willibald Friedrich Ruch
Jennifer Hofmann
Tracey Platt
author_facet Willibald Friedrich Ruch
Jennifer Hofmann
Tracey Platt
author_sort Willibald Friedrich Ruch
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators (joyful, intense, schadenfreude laughter, grinning). Study 1 examined the encoding of facial features in 18 illustrations by the Facial Action Coding System and study 2 investigated the decoding by laypeople. Illustrations of laughter involving a Duchenne Display (DD) were perceived as joyful irrespective of their initial classification. In intense laughter, the intensity of the zygomatic major muscle predicted the perception of intensity, but not the proposed changes in the upper face. In fact, "frowning" seemed to be antagonistic to the perception of joy. Schadenfreude and grinning did not have high recognition rates. Going along with the idea that schadenfreude is either a blend of a positive and negative emotion, or solely joy with attempts of masking it, it may entail additional features beyond the DD. Grinning was best represented by low intensity laughter, narrowed eye aperture and mouth prolonging actions. So far, only the DD could be reliably morphologically differentiated and recognized, supporting Darwin’s proposal of joyful laughter being the laughter prototype.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:00:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f54b19e52e69410c91795f6bc04c54dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2307-700X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:00:18Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies
record_format Article
series The European Journal of Humour Research
spelling doaj.art-f54b19e52e69410c91795f6bc04c54dd2022-12-21T23:02:00ZengCracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language StudiesThe European Journal of Humour Research2307-700X2013-03-01119911810.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.ruch6Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrationsWillibald Friedrich Ruch0Jennifer Hofmann1Tracey Platt2Department of Psychology - University of ZurichUniversity of ZurichDepartment of Psychology - University of ZurichThis study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators (joyful, intense, schadenfreude laughter, grinning). Study 1 examined the encoding of facial features in 18 illustrations by the Facial Action Coding System and study 2 investigated the decoding by laypeople. Illustrations of laughter involving a Duchenne Display (DD) were perceived as joyful irrespective of their initial classification. In intense laughter, the intensity of the zygomatic major muscle predicted the perception of intensity, but not the proposed changes in the upper face. In fact, "frowning" seemed to be antagonistic to the perception of joy. Schadenfreude and grinning did not have high recognition rates. Going along with the idea that schadenfreude is either a blend of a positive and negative emotion, or solely joy with attempts of masking it, it may entail additional features beyond the DD. Grinning was best represented by low intensity laughter, narrowed eye aperture and mouth prolonging actions. So far, only the DD could be reliably morphologically differentiated and recognized, supporting Darwin’s proposal of joyful laughter being the laughter prototype.https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display
spellingShingle Willibald Friedrich Ruch
Jennifer Hofmann
Tracey Platt
Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
The European Journal of Humour Research
laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display
title Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
title_full Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
title_fullStr Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
title_full_unstemmed Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
title_short Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
title_sort investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
topic laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display
url https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19
work_keys_str_mv AT willibaldfriedrichruch investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations
AT jenniferhofmann investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations
AT traceyplatt investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations