Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations
This study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies
2013-03-01
|
Series: | The European Journal of Humour Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19 |
_version_ | 1818417035803099136 |
---|---|
author | Willibald Friedrich Ruch Jennifer Hofmann Tracey Platt |
author_facet | Willibald Friedrich Ruch Jennifer Hofmann Tracey Platt |
author_sort | Willibald Friedrich Ruch |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators (joyful, intense, schadenfreude laughter, grinning). Study 1 examined the encoding of facial features in 18 illustrations by the Facial Action Coding System and study 2 investigated the decoding by laypeople. Illustrations of laughter involving a Duchenne Display (DD) were perceived as joyful irrespective of their initial classification. In intense laughter, the intensity of the zygomatic major muscle predicted the perception of intensity, but not the proposed changes in the upper face. In fact, "frowning" seemed to be antagonistic to the perception of joy. Schadenfreude and grinning did not have high recognition rates. Going along with the idea that schadenfreude is either a blend of a positive and negative emotion, or solely joy with attempts of masking it, it may entail additional features beyond the DD. Grinning was best represented by low intensity laughter, narrowed eye aperture and mouth prolonging actions. So far, only the DD could be reliably morphologically differentiated and recognized, supporting Darwin’s proposal of joyful laughter being the laughter prototype. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T12:00:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f54b19e52e69410c91795f6bc04c54dd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2307-700X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T12:00:18Z |
publishDate | 2013-03-01 |
publisher | Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies |
record_format | Article |
series | The European Journal of Humour Research |
spelling | doaj.art-f54b19e52e69410c91795f6bc04c54dd2022-12-21T23:02:00ZengCracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language StudiesThe European Journal of Humour Research2307-700X2013-03-01119911810.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.ruch6Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrationsWillibald Friedrich Ruch0Jennifer Hofmann1Tracey Platt2Department of Psychology - University of ZurichUniversity of ZurichDepartment of Psychology - University of ZurichThis study investigates the facial features of different laughter types in historic illustrations. Several conceptually different types of laughter were proposed in the historic literature, but only four types were represented in visual and verbal illustrations by four or more historic illustrators (joyful, intense, schadenfreude laughter, grinning). Study 1 examined the encoding of facial features in 18 illustrations by the Facial Action Coding System and study 2 investigated the decoding by laypeople. Illustrations of laughter involving a Duchenne Display (DD) were perceived as joyful irrespective of their initial classification. In intense laughter, the intensity of the zygomatic major muscle predicted the perception of intensity, but not the proposed changes in the upper face. In fact, "frowning" seemed to be antagonistic to the perception of joy. Schadenfreude and grinning did not have high recognition rates. Going along with the idea that schadenfreude is either a blend of a positive and negative emotion, or solely joy with attempts of masking it, it may entail additional features beyond the DD. Grinning was best represented by low intensity laughter, narrowed eye aperture and mouth prolonging actions. So far, only the DD could be reliably morphologically differentiated and recognized, supporting Darwin’s proposal of joyful laughter being the laughter prototype.https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display |
spellingShingle | Willibald Friedrich Ruch Jennifer Hofmann Tracey Platt Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations The European Journal of Humour Research laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display |
title | Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
title_full | Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
title_fullStr | Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
title_short | Investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
title_sort | investigating facial features of four types of laughter in historic illustrations |
topic | laughter, types, facs, darwin, expression of emotion, duchenne display |
url | https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willibaldfriedrichruch investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations AT jenniferhofmann investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations AT traceyplatt investigatingfacialfeaturesoffourtypesoflaughterinhistoricillustrations |