Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification

ObjectiveAtrial fibrillation is associated with a high incidence of heart valve disease. There are few prospective clinical research comparing aortic valve replacement with and without surgical ablation for safety and effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of aortic valv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruikang Guo, Chengming Fan, Zhishan Sun, Hao Zhang, Yaqin Sun, Long Song, Zenan Jiang, Liming Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1092068/full
_version_ 1797854171368521728
author Ruikang Guo
Chengming Fan
Zhishan Sun
Hao Zhang
Yaqin Sun
Long Song
Zenan Jiang
Liming Liu
author_facet Ruikang Guo
Chengming Fan
Zhishan Sun
Hao Zhang
Yaqin Sun
Long Song
Zenan Jiang
Liming Liu
author_sort Ruikang Guo
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveAtrial fibrillation is associated with a high incidence of heart valve disease. There are few prospective clinical research comparing aortic valve replacement with and without surgical ablation for safety and effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of aortic valve replacement with and without the Cox-maze IV procedure in patients with calcific aortic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe analyzed one hundred and eight patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were divided into concomitant Cox maze surgery (Cox-maze group) and no concomitant Cox-maze operation (no Cox-maze group). After surgery, freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and all-cause mortality were evaluated.ResultsFreedom from all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement at 1 year was 100% in the Cox-maze group and 89%, respectively, in the no Cox-maze group. No Cox-maze group had a lower rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and arrhythmia control than those in the Cox-maze group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012, respectively). Pre-operatively higher systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio, 1.096; 95% CI, 1.004–1.196; P = 0.04) and post-operatively increased right atrium diameters (hazard ratio, 1.755; 95% CI, 1.182–2.604; P = 0.005) were associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence.ConclusionThe Cox-maze IV surgery combined with aortic valve replacement increased mid-term survival and decreased mid-term atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Pre-operatively higher systolic blood pressure and post-operatively increased right atrium diameters are associated with the prediction of recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:01:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f54bb8ce86f6495aa3b84dfbdeb36150
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T20:01:26Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f54bb8ce86f6495aa3b84dfbdeb361502023-04-03T04:41:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-04-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.10920681092068Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcificationRuikang GuoChengming FanZhishan SunHao ZhangYaqin SunLong SongZenan JiangLiming LiuObjectiveAtrial fibrillation is associated with a high incidence of heart valve disease. There are few prospective clinical research comparing aortic valve replacement with and without surgical ablation for safety and effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of aortic valve replacement with and without the Cox-maze IV procedure in patients with calcific aortic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe analyzed one hundred and eight patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were divided into concomitant Cox maze surgery (Cox-maze group) and no concomitant Cox-maze operation (no Cox-maze group). After surgery, freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and all-cause mortality were evaluated.ResultsFreedom from all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement at 1 year was 100% in the Cox-maze group and 89%, respectively, in the no Cox-maze group. No Cox-maze group had a lower rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and arrhythmia control than those in the Cox-maze group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012, respectively). Pre-operatively higher systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio, 1.096; 95% CI, 1.004–1.196; P = 0.04) and post-operatively increased right atrium diameters (hazard ratio, 1.755; 95% CI, 1.182–2.604; P = 0.005) were associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence.ConclusionThe Cox-maze IV surgery combined with aortic valve replacement increased mid-term survival and decreased mid-term atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Pre-operatively higher systolic blood pressure and post-operatively increased right atrium diameters are associated with the prediction of recurrence of atrial fibrillation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1092068/fullcalcific aortic valve diseaseaortic stenosisatrial fibrillationsurgical ablationefficacysafety
spellingShingle Ruikang Guo
Chengming Fan
Zhishan Sun
Hao Zhang
Yaqin Sun
Long Song
Zenan Jiang
Liming Liu
Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
calcific aortic valve disease
aortic stenosis
atrial fibrillation
surgical ablation
efficacy
safety
title Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
title_full Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
title_short Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety of cox maze iv procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification
topic calcific aortic valve disease
aortic stenosis
atrial fibrillation
surgical ablation
efficacy
safety
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1092068/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruikangguo clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT chengmingfan clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT zhishansun clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT haozhang clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT yaqinsun clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT longsong clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT zenanjiang clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification
AT limingliu clinicalefficacyandsafetyofcoxmazeivprocedureforatrialfibrillationinpatientswithaorticvalvecalcification