Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology

Background: A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit is an inexpensive, accessible therapeutic device with multiple dermatology-related uses. Objective: This review aims to describe the dermatological applications of TENS. Methods: PubMed was searched for literature related to TENS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael J. Visconti, Wasim Haidari, Steven R. Feldman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657227
_version_ 1797683647200886784
author Michael J. Visconti
Wasim Haidari
Steven R. Feldman
author_facet Michael J. Visconti
Wasim Haidari
Steven R. Feldman
author_sort Michael J. Visconti
collection DOAJ
description Background: A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit is an inexpensive, accessible therapeutic device with multiple dermatology-related uses. Objective: This review aims to describe the dermatological applications of TENS. Methods: PubMed was searched for literature related to TENS in dermatology. Articles describing this association were reviewed for evidence. Results: TENS offered pain relief during photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratoses, with a reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) scores for patients using TENS during photodynamic therapy compared to those using no intervention. In the treatment of refractory postherpetic neuralgia pain, patients received greater pain relief when given pregabalin along with TENS therapy compared to pregabalin and no TENS therapy. TENS was the most effective therapy in reducing the incidence of PHN when compared to antiviral agents or combination therapy. The administration of TENS three times per week for four weeks improved VAS scores for pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis and lichen simplex chronicus. This benefit extended into the treatment of other conditions, resulting in improvement of pruritus measured by VAS and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores for macular amyloidosis and lichen planus. Conclusions: TENS is beneficial in the field of dermatology, particularly involving the relief of chronic pruritus.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f554dbe17698465c9f2b16667d19355e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0954-6634
1471-1753
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:37Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatological Treatment
spelling doaj.art-f554dbe17698465c9f2b16667d19355e2023-09-15T14:23:03ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Dermatological Treatment0954-66341471-17532020-11-0131884684910.1080/09546634.2019.16572271657227Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatologyMichael J. Visconti0Wasim Haidari1Steven R. Feldman2Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of MedicineCenter for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of MedicineCenter for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of MedicineBackground: A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit is an inexpensive, accessible therapeutic device with multiple dermatology-related uses. Objective: This review aims to describe the dermatological applications of TENS. Methods: PubMed was searched for literature related to TENS in dermatology. Articles describing this association were reviewed for evidence. Results: TENS offered pain relief during photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratoses, with a reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) scores for patients using TENS during photodynamic therapy compared to those using no intervention. In the treatment of refractory postherpetic neuralgia pain, patients received greater pain relief when given pregabalin along with TENS therapy compared to pregabalin and no TENS therapy. TENS was the most effective therapy in reducing the incidence of PHN when compared to antiviral agents or combination therapy. The administration of TENS three times per week for four weeks improved VAS scores for pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis and lichen simplex chronicus. This benefit extended into the treatment of other conditions, resulting in improvement of pruritus measured by VAS and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores for macular amyloidosis and lichen planus. Conclusions: TENS is beneficial in the field of dermatology, particularly involving the relief of chronic pruritus.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657227tenstranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationprurituspain
spellingShingle Michael J. Visconti
Wasim Haidari
Steven R. Feldman
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
tens
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
pruritus
pain
title Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
title_full Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
title_fullStr Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
title_short Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology
title_sort transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation tens a review of applications in dermatology
topic tens
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
pruritus
pain
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657227
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljvisconti transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensareviewofapplicationsindermatology
AT wasimhaidari transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensareviewofapplicationsindermatology
AT stevenrfeldman transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensareviewofapplicationsindermatology