Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy

Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. Methods From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen rand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Falk Stade, Jan-Oliver Dittmar, Oliver Jäkel, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Jürgen Debus, Stephanie E. Combs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z
_version_ 1818910466619998208
author Falk Stade
Jan-Oliver Dittmar
Oliver Jäkel
Clemens Kratochwil
Uwe Haberkorn
Jürgen Debus
Stephanie E. Combs
author_facet Falk Stade
Jan-Oliver Dittmar
Oliver Jäkel
Clemens Kratochwil
Uwe Haberkorn
Jürgen Debus
Stephanie E. Combs
author_sort Falk Stade
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. Methods From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen randomly for the present analysis. Target volume definition was performed based on CT and MRI only, as well as with additional 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Treatment plans were performed for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy using active raster scanning on both target volumes. We calculated doses to relevant organs at risk (OAR), conformity indices as well as differences in normal tissue sparing between both radiation modalities based on CT/MRI planning as well as CT/MRI/PET planning. Results For photon treatment plans, PET-based treatment plans showed a reduction of brain stem Dmax and Dmedian for different levels of total dose. At the optic chiasm, use of 68Ga-DOTATOC significantly reduces Dmax; moreover, the Dmedian is reduced in most cases, too. For both right and left optic nerve, reduction of dose by addition of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal and depends on the anatomical location of the meningioma. In protons, the impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal compared to photons. Conclusion Addition of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET information into treatment planning for skull base meningiomas has a significant impact on target volumes. In most cases, PET-planning leads to significant reductions of the treatment volumes. Subsequently, reduced doses are applied to OAR. Using protons, the benefit of additional PET is smaller since target coverage is more conformal and dose to OAR is already reduced compared to photons. Therefore, PET-imaging has the greatest margin of benefit in advanced photon techniques, and combination of PET-planning and high-precision treatment leads to comparable treatment plans as with protons.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T22:43:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f563d713f21f432282581009dba45d98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-717X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T22:43:15Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-f563d713f21f432282581009dba45d982022-12-21T20:03:00ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2018-04-011311710.1186/s13014-018-1008-zInfluence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapyFalk Stade0Jan-Oliver Dittmar1Oliver Jäkel2Clemens Kratochwil3Uwe Haberkorn4Jürgen Debus5Stephanie E. Combs6Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität MünchenAbstract Background To evaluate the impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. Methods From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen randomly for the present analysis. Target volume definition was performed based on CT and MRI only, as well as with additional 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Treatment plans were performed for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy using active raster scanning on both target volumes. We calculated doses to relevant organs at risk (OAR), conformity indices as well as differences in normal tissue sparing between both radiation modalities based on CT/MRI planning as well as CT/MRI/PET planning. Results For photon treatment plans, PET-based treatment plans showed a reduction of brain stem Dmax and Dmedian for different levels of total dose. At the optic chiasm, use of 68Ga-DOTATOC significantly reduces Dmax; moreover, the Dmedian is reduced in most cases, too. For both right and left optic nerve, reduction of dose by addition of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal and depends on the anatomical location of the meningioma. In protons, the impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal compared to photons. Conclusion Addition of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET information into treatment planning for skull base meningiomas has a significant impact on target volumes. In most cases, PET-planning leads to significant reductions of the treatment volumes. Subsequently, reduced doses are applied to OAR. Using protons, the benefit of additional PET is smaller since target coverage is more conformal and dose to OAR is already reduced compared to photons. Therefore, PET-imaging has the greatest margin of benefit in advanced photon techniques, and combination of PET-planning and high-precision treatment leads to comparable treatment plans as with protons.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z68Ga-DOTATOC-PETSkull base meningiomaIMRTProton therapyOAR
spellingShingle Falk Stade
Jan-Oliver Dittmar
Oliver Jäkel
Clemens Kratochwil
Uwe Haberkorn
Jürgen Debus
Stephanie E. Combs
Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
Radiation Oncology
68Ga-DOTATOC-PET
Skull base meningioma
IMRT
Proton therapy
OAR
title Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_full Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_fullStr Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_short Influence of 68Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_sort influence of 68ga dotatoc on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
topic 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET
Skull base meningioma
IMRT
Proton therapy
OAR
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z
work_keys_str_mv AT falkstade influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT janoliverdittmar influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT oliverjakel influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT clemenskratochwil influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT uwehaberkorn influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT jurgendebus influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT stephanieecombs influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy