Understanding (un)certainty in human geographic quantitative spatial analysis – commentary to Tulumello
This commentary reflects uncertainty in human geographic quantitative spatial analysis within the context of Simone Tulumello’s essay (in this issue). Epistemologically, positivism, logical empiricism and behaviourism must be understood as historical stages in the evolution of quantitative human geo...
Main Author: | Ossi Kotavaara |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Geographical Society of Finland
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Fennia: International Journal of Geography |
Online Access: | https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/80216 |
Similar Items
-
Mapping the 'gray area' – commentary to Tulumello
by: Jouni Häkli
Published: (2019-04-01) -
No trenches: toward inclusive and hybrid methodologies – commentary to Tulumello
by: Guntram H. Herb
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Measuring Accessibility and Optimising Logistics of Marginal Land Grass Biomass in the Case of Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
by: Ollila Katri, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
From the world of society
by: Kaarina Tervo-Kankare, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Tracking with (Un)Certainty
by: Abe D. Hofman, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)