On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging

We propose a mathematical study of the statistics of chlorophyll fluorescence indices. While most of the literature assumes Gaussian distributions for these indices, we demonstrate their fundamental non-Gaussian nature. Indeed, while the noise in the raw fluorescence images can be assumed as Gaussia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelina El Ghaziri, Nizar Bouhlel, Natalia Sapoukhina, David Rousseau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/2/528
_version_ 1797437403496972288
author Angelina El Ghaziri
Nizar Bouhlel
Natalia Sapoukhina
David Rousseau
author_facet Angelina El Ghaziri
Nizar Bouhlel
Natalia Sapoukhina
David Rousseau
author_sort Angelina El Ghaziri
collection DOAJ
description We propose a mathematical study of the statistics of chlorophyll fluorescence indices. While most of the literature assumes Gaussian distributions for these indices, we demonstrate their fundamental non-Gaussian nature. Indeed, while the noise in the raw fluorescence images can be assumed as Gaussian additive, the deterministic ratio between them produces nonlinear non-Gaussian distributions. We investigate the states in which this non-Gaussianity can affect the statistical estimation when wrongly approached with linear estimators. We provide an expectation–maximization estimator adapted to the non-Gaussian distributions. We illustrate the interest of this estimator with simulations from images of chlorophyll fluorescence indices.. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach by comparison with the standard Gaussian assumption. Our expectation–maximization estimator shows low estimation errors reaching seven percent for a more pronounced deviation from Gaussianity compared to Gaussianity assumptions estimators rising to more than 70 percent estimation error. These results show the importance of considering rigorous mathematical estimation approaches in chlorophyll fluorescence indices. The application of this work could be extended to various vegetation indices also made up of a ratio of Gaussian distributions.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:19:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f565364abe6e4abbb88637ba06f3992b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:19:42Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-f565364abe6e4abbb88637ba06f3992b2023-12-01T00:23:15ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-01-0115252810.3390/rs15020528On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence ImagingAngelina El Ghaziri0Nizar Bouhlel1Natalia Sapoukhina2David Rousseau3Institut Agro, Université d’Angers, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, 49000 Angers, FranceInstitut Agro, Université d’Angers, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, 49000 Angers, FranceInstitut Agro, Université d’Angers, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, 49000 Angers, FranceLARIS, UMR INRAe IRHS, Université d’Angers, 62 Avenue Notre Dame du Lac, 49000 Angers, FranceWe propose a mathematical study of the statistics of chlorophyll fluorescence indices. While most of the literature assumes Gaussian distributions for these indices, we demonstrate their fundamental non-Gaussian nature. Indeed, while the noise in the raw fluorescence images can be assumed as Gaussian additive, the deterministic ratio between them produces nonlinear non-Gaussian distributions. We investigate the states in which this non-Gaussianity can affect the statistical estimation when wrongly approached with linear estimators. We provide an expectation–maximization estimator adapted to the non-Gaussian distributions. We illustrate the interest of this estimator with simulations from images of chlorophyll fluorescence indices.. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach by comparison with the standard Gaussian assumption. Our expectation–maximization estimator shows low estimation errors reaching seven percent for a more pronounced deviation from Gaussianity compared to Gaussianity assumptions estimators rising to more than 70 percent estimation error. These results show the importance of considering rigorous mathematical estimation approaches in chlorophyll fluorescence indices. The application of this work could be extended to various vegetation indices also made up of a ratio of Gaussian distributions.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/2/528<i>Arabidopsis</i>Bayesian inferenceExpectation–Maximization (EM) algorithmparameter estimationplant imagingstatistics
spellingShingle Angelina El Ghaziri
Nizar Bouhlel
Natalia Sapoukhina
David Rousseau
On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
Remote Sensing
<i>Arabidopsis</i>
Bayesian inference
Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm
parameter estimation
plant imaging
statistics
title On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
title_full On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
title_fullStr On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
title_full_unstemmed On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
title_short On the Importance of Non-Gaussianity in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
title_sort on the importance of non gaussianity in chlorophyll fluorescence imaging
topic <i>Arabidopsis</i>
Bayesian inference
Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm
parameter estimation
plant imaging
statistics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/2/528
work_keys_str_mv AT angelinaelghaziri ontheimportanceofnongaussianityinchlorophyllfluorescenceimaging
AT nizarbouhlel ontheimportanceofnongaussianityinchlorophyllfluorescenceimaging
AT nataliasapoukhina ontheimportanceofnongaussianityinchlorophyllfluorescenceimaging
AT davidrousseau ontheimportanceofnongaussianityinchlorophyllfluorescenceimaging